Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
These are not our most current picks! Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2025 Season Week 1 Picks.
NFL 2005 Season Week 13 Picks
































































0.812

0.693
0.645
0.635
0.875

0.661
0.582
0.569
0.938

0.714
0.642
0.625
0.750

0.646
0.632
0.619



Week: | 14 - 2 0.875 |
Season: | 126 - 66 0.656 |
Lifetime: | 608 - 384 0.613 |
![]() | Vikings 21 @ Lions 16 | ![]() |
![]() | JeremyLock-box. By which of course I mean the classic trap game and situation in which the Vikings lay an egg 97.9% of the time. |
![]() | MattMike Tice still sucks. |
![]() | JonThe Anthony Carter Bowl. |
![]() | SarahFor although we may not be alone in the universe, in our own separate ways on this planet, we are all... alone. |
![]() | Raiders 10 @ Chargers 34 | ![]() |
![]() | JeremyFor the love of God, get Randy the ball. Maybe make up some sort of guideline for getting him the ball on a certain percentage of plays. That kind of strategery is foolproof. |
![]() | MattIf the Vikings still had Moss, they would be 11-0 right now. |
![]() | JonSan Diego seems like they should be a better team, but they might not even make the playoffs. |
![]() | SarahI was born a loser, but you're one by choice. |
![]() | Seahawks 42 @ Eagles 0 | ![]() |
![]() | JeremyI realize they were in the Superbowl last year, but it feels like we comment on Philly every week. Speaking of the Superbowl why did they get the Rolling Stones for the halftime show? Was their logic to have someone play at Superbowl XL that could have played the halftime show at Superbowl I? Wouldn't you want to put your money on a group that doesn't have about a 75% chance of losing at least one member by then? I mean really there's like a 2% chance one keels over before anyone even gets to read this. |
![]() | MattForget about Shaun Alexander, if the Seahawks want to go anywhere they should run the offense through Bobby Engram. |
![]() | JonThis is like the "not quite a distinguishable color" jersey game. |
![]() | SarahWow. Admit it, you just want to play house. Woman, get back in here and make me a sandwich! |
























I've been sitting here for five minutes and I honestly have nothing to say. Except that I found out that my cousin and his wife have been looking at buying the basement right next to Jeremy's and Sarah's, but I think they've decided to look for something cheaper.




We just thought this particular situation was funny because no one threw a flag on the hit, Favre just lay there grimacing, then all of a sudden someone decided it was roughing the passer after the fact and threw the flag. If you didn't see it you're in no position to question the validity of this claim.
It's not a question of other people trying to get the calls or whether or not a play warrents a call. I'm sure you could find a reason that according to the rules every one of his roughing the passer calls had something happen on it. The point it that he gets WAY more of those calls than the average QB.
On one play yesterday Brad Johnson was tackled by a player grabbing inside the top of his helmet and pulling him backwards and it didn't get a flag. It was basically facemasking (except above the facemask) and he certainly "touched the QB's head". He was then hogtied and tackled by his head, thrown out of bounds. If this were Brett the sideline would have been choked with penalty flags. Instead there were zero.
Case and point: How many times this year have we had this conversation? Because Brad and Daunte have combined for 0 roughing the passer penalties. Favre gets at least one obligatory call a game and half of that time it gets them out of some "we just lost the game" type jam, hence the name "The Bret Favre Rule"




I admit I didn't see the play, but maybe if you guys didn't complain about every single call I would take the claim more seriously.
I'm just saying that it's annoying, and it takes the same amount of energy and intelligence to argue either side. Get over it. Michael Jordan got some calls in his day. Pro sports today operates where the good players get the benifit of calls sometime. Watch a basketball game with any of the top 25 players in the league and tell me that that particular player is not benefitting somehow from the calls going his way. Maybe the calls aren't always legit, but it is pretty consistant with how pro sports operates on a whole. The good players get calls in their favor. Get over it. Complaining for a week about it every single solitary time he gets a RTP call is not going to change the fact that it happens. Man, lets talk about something intelligent. The Packers are 2-10 and still people need to find something to rag them on.
Also, I've heard one of the 3 Viking fan Page3 writers ever admit that a Favre RTP call was legit. So that's how I come up with the idea that none of you think any are legit.
Page3 is turning this issue into the new TO. Talk about something else for a change.





Jon, that was the one I was referring to.








Name: | |||
Comment: | |||
| |||


Packers 7 @ Bears 19
Jeremy
GO PACK GO! Seriously though, the Packers could potentially help the Vikings a ton by allowing the Sweep and beating the Bears once or twice. A potential 4 game swing provided by one team.Matt
I still won't root for the Packers.Jon
This could be the entire city of Green Bay playing the Bears and I still think Chicago would have the edge. It's a bit of an old joke, but I like it.Sarah
If coincidences are just coincidences, why do they feel so contrived?