Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
These are not our most current picks! Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2025 Season Week 1 Picks.
NFL 2006 Season Week 1 Picks
Dolphins 17 @ Steelers 28
Final
Thu, 9/7/06 7:30pm
3 Picks - 43%
4 Picks - 57%
Dolphins

Steelers

Steelers

Dolphins

Falcons 20 @ Panthers 6
Final
Sun, 9/10/06 12:00pm
0 Picks - 0%
8 Picks - 100%
Panthers

Panthers

Panthers

Panthers

Ravens 27 @ Buccaneers 0
Final
Sun, 9/10/06 12:00pm
2 Picks - 25%
6 Picks - 75%
Ravens

Buccaneers

Buccaneers

Buccaneers

Bills 17 @ Patriots 19
Final
Sun, 9/10/06 12:00pm
1 Pick - 13%
7 Picks - 87%
Patriots

Patriots

Patriots

Patriots

Bengals 23 @ Chiefs 10
Final
Sun, 9/10/06 12:00pm
6 Picks - 75%
2 Picks - 25%
Bengals

Bengals

Bengals

Bengals

Broncos 10 @ Rams 18
Final
Sun, 9/10/06 12:00pm
6 Picks - 75%
2 Picks - 25%
Broncos

Broncos

Broncos

Rams

Saints 19 @ Browns 14
Final
Sun, 9/10/06 12:00pm
3 Picks - 38%
5 Picks - 62%
Browns

Browns

Browns

Saints

Jets 23 @ Titans 16
Final
Sun, 9/10/06 12:00pm
3 Picks - 38%
5 Picks - 62%
Jets

Jets

Titans

Titans

Eagles 24 @ Texans 10
Final
Sun, 9/10/06 12:00pm
7 Picks - 88%
1 Pick - 12%
Eagles

Texans

Eagles

Eagles

Seahawks 9 @ Lions 6
Final
Sun, 9/10/06 12:00pm
8 Picks - 100%
0 Picks - 0%
Seahawks

Seahawks

Seahawks

Seahawks

Bears 26 @ Packers 0
Final
Sun, 9/10/06 3:15pm
5 Picks - 63%
3 Picks - 37%
Bears

Bears

Bears

Packers

Cowboys 17 @ Jaguars 24
Final
Sun, 9/10/06 3:15pm
5 Picks - 63%
3 Picks - 37%
Cowboys

Jaguars

Cowboys

Cowboys

49ers 27 @ Cardinals 34
Final
Sun, 9/10/06 3:15pm
0 Picks - 0%
8 Picks - 100%
Cardinals

Cardinals

Cardinals

Cardinals

Colts 26 @ Giants 21
Final
Sun, 9/10/06 7:15pm
7 Picks - 88%
1 Pick - 12%
Colts

Colts

Colts

Giants

Vikings 19 @ Commanders 16
Final
Mon, 9/11/06 6:00pm
5 Picks - 63%
3 Picks - 37%
Vikings

Vikings

Vikings

Vikings

Chargers 27 @ Raiders 0
Final
Mon, 9/11/06 9:15pm
8 Picks - 100%
0 Picks - 0%
Chargers

Chargers

Chargers

Chargers

Week Record:
11 - 50.688

Season Record:
11 - 50.688
No-Pack-Vike Record:
615 - 3410.643
Lifetime Record:
688 - 3950.635
Week Record:
11 - 50.688

Season Record:
11 - 50.688
No-Pack-Vike Record:
561 - 3950.587
Lifetime Record:
622 - 4610.574
Week Record:
10 - 60.625

Season Record:
10 - 60.625
No-Pack-Vike Record:
615 - 3410.643
Lifetime Record:
680 - 4030.628
Week Record:
9 - 70.562

Season Record:
9 - 70.562
No-Pack-Vike Record:
602 - 3540.630
Lifetime Record:
668 - 4150.617



Steelers
Panthers
Buccaneers
Patriots
Bengals
Broncos
Browns
Titans
Eagles
Seahawks
Packers
Cowboys
Cardinals
Colts
Commanders
Chargers
Week: | 8 - 8 0.500 |
Season: | 8 - 8 0.500 |
Lifetime: | 8 - 8 0.500 |


Dolphins
Panthers
Buccaneers
Bills
Chiefs
Broncos
Saints
Titans
Eagles
Seahawks
Packers
Cowboys
Cardinals
Colts
Commanders
Chargers
Week: | 6 - 10 0.375 |
Season: | 6 - 10 0.375 |
Lifetime: | 6 - 10 0.375 |


Panthers
Buccaneers
Patriots
Chiefs
Broncos
Saints
Jets
Eagles
Seahawks
Bears
Jaguars
Cardinals
Colts
Commanders
Chargers
Week: | 10 - 5 0.667 |
Season: | 10 - 5 0.667 |
Lifetime: | 10 - 5 0.667 |


Steelers
Panthers
Ravens
Patriots
Bengals
Rams
Browns
Titans
Eagles
Seahawks
Bears
Jaguars
Cardinals
Colts
Vikings
Chargers
Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
Season: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
Lifetime: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
![]() | Bears 26 @ Packers 0 | ![]() |
![]() | JeremyDid you guys hear Brett Favre decided to come back? There was almost no taking a franchise hostage or anything! I'm sick of people saying the Bears will repeat when they only won last year because everyone else was so bad. |
![]() | MattA little game of Over/Under for the comments section:1. Interceptions thrown by Favre in this game. O/U (2). 2. Number of snaps taken by Aaron Rodgers in this game. O/U (3.5). |
![]() | JonAnother season begins for "the guy ahead of ARod on the depth chart". |
![]() | SarahOh man, I was at the game last Friday, and while the first string defense and offense looked impressive for their one series a piece, I just don't know what they will do during the actual season. If Ahman Green comes back strong and can run without any blocking by an invisible o-line, we should be ok. |
![]() | Colts 26 @ Giants 21 | ![]() |
![]() | JeremyI'm really surprised this game isn't being hyped more. Pancakes! Checkin' to Pancakes people! Seriously though one of these two teams has to install an audible called 'Pancakes', right? |
![]() | MattI think Manning will have a good game. |
![]() | JonBecause America loves alliteration, this shall now be called the Manning Mayhem. |
![]() | SarahManning vs. Manning. Potentially the game of the year? Since Peyton will choke, and younger siblings like to show up their older siblings, I am going to give this one to Eli. |
![]() | Vikings 19 @ Commanders 16 | ![]() |
![]() | JeremyI can almost name 3 Vikings starters this year. Ok, that's not true, I could name alot...maybe all of them...but still I think my point is valid. (Although it's questionable whether of not there was a point there at all.) The Vikings did their usual 'lights out' preseason defense, but I refuse to get my hopes up. I've made that mistake before. |
![]() | MattA few notes about the Vikings:1. Their new uniforms suck. 2. I can't believe they traded Daunte Culpepper. 3. I still can't believe they traded Randy Moss. 4. They're still better than the rest of the teams in the NFC North. |
![]() | JonOver the offseason, I figured I would pick against the Vikings this game. But I think they have enough to do it. |
![]() | SarahThe Vikings D has looked ok this preseason which means they will suck during the regular season. :) However, I don't think the Redskins have the weapons to get it done this first week. (Portis?) Chalk up a win for the rival. |
![]() | Chargers 27 @ Raiders 0 | ![]() |
![]() | JeremyOh Randy, why have you forsaken me? The Sr. Nutcan staff got to witness Randy's return to the Metrodome this preseason. You could tell the entire crowd wanted nothing more than for Randy to score. Unfortunately Brooks played so bad that they didn't have a pass completed until damn near halftime. Jeff George to Randy Moss anyone? |
![]() | MattArt Shell for Coach of the Year. |
![]() | JonAaron Brooks looked terrible every time I saw him this preseason. |
![]() | SarahThe Chargers have some powerful offensive weapons, but some of their defense has seen actual weapons in the preseason. Ahem. I saw the Raiders live a few weeks ago (put a $(^(!426*!@&^$*!&@#^$ jersey on) and was not entirely impressed. The Chargers should win this one no problem unless Aaron Brooks can find his targets. |


Jeremy - 9183 Posts
09/06/2006 @ 09:20:22 AM
Oh this is exciting!!!!


Scott - 6053 Posts
09/06/2006 @ 09:27:31 AM
This is the most pumped I've been for the new season of NutCan NFL Picks. Thanks NutCan!!!


Jeremy - 9183 Posts
09/06/2006 @ 11:49:33 AM
Lori Nickel, of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, reports Green Bay Packers WR Robert Ferguson was not upset that WR Greg Jennings leapfrogged him for the No. 2 wide receiver job.
Jeremy screwed with this at 09/06/2006 11:50:33 am


Scott - 6053 Posts
09/06/2006 @ 03:20:42 PM
Jennings did have catches of 85 and 89 yards. That would be enough for me to bump a rookie ahead of a guy who still plays like a rookie.
If I were the guy who got bumped though, I'd be upset. I wonder what kind of competitor Ferguson actually is.
If I were the guy who got bumped though, I'd be upset. I wonder what kind of competitor Ferguson actually is.
Scott messed with this at 09/06/2006 3:21:46 pm


Jon - Nutcan.com's kitten expert
09/06/2006 @ 03:39:49 PM
That's just something people say. It doesn't mean he likes it, it just means he doesn't want to make something of it and cause more trouble.


Jeremy - Always thinking of, but never about, the children.
09/06/2006 @ 04:05:22 PM
He went on to say more, but I couldn't paste all of it at once for some reason. Clearly the webmaster needs to take a look at that.
He said he thought he played well so he was surprised by it. He "loves" Jennings "to death" and "if it were anyone else...". Packers coaches just thought Jennings had a preseason you couldn't ignore.
He said he thought he played well so he was surprised by it. He "loves" Jennings "to death" and "if it were anyone else...". Packers coaches just thought Jennings had a preseason you couldn't ignore.
Jeremy perfected this 2 times, last at 09/06/2006 4:07:34 pm


Scott - 6053 Posts
09/06/2006 @ 04:38:28 PM
Greg Jennings had a pro-bowl caliber preseason. Although there is probably a pretty huge list of unknown's who have had great preseasons. And when I say probowl, I mean he had a couple good catches. He also dropped a few passes, but the game in which he did pretty much everyone was dropping passes. Anyway, he'll have a great year, hold out next season, break his knee in the first game, and get traded to the cardinals during next year's draft.
ps, Jon, if you are coming to Navs tonight, bring the bobblehead, and I'll bring a check for softball.
ps, Jon, if you are coming to Navs tonight, bring the bobblehead, and I'll bring a check for softball.
Scott perfected this 2 times, last at 09/06/2006 4:40:44 pm


Scott - 6053 Posts
09/06/2006 @ 04:42:40 PM
Sarah, would you still cheer for Favre if he was playing for, say, the Jets, or Rams, or Chiefs? Just curious, because Favre said he wouldn't rule out playing for another team if the opportunity presented itself.


Sarah - 4621 Posts
09/06/2006 @ 05:03:38 PM
I don't know. I mean obviously, he's given a lot to us, but he also said he'd never leave us and I can't really picture him going anywhere else. He has said over and over again that he wouldn't go any place else and then he keeps talking about whether or not he'll retire each year. I think I'd be pretty pissed if he would go to another team. It just wouldn't be right.


Scott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings
09/06/2006 @ 05:12:23 PM
It's kind of like sending your kid off to college. You know their just going to rot away if they stay at home (analogous of the current situation in GB), and sending them off to college, while bittersweet, you know they can become a doctor or a lawyer or a teacher and make something of their life (analogous of Favre going to a potential super bowl team). I think if it ever came to pass, I will cheer for Favre the way I cheer for every player who has played in Wisconsin for a significant time and then gone somewhere else. Basically, I hope Favre plays as long as he still wants to play. If that is somewhere other than Green Bay, so be it. I respect the decision of Jerry Rice, Joe Montana, Emmett Smith, Michael Jordan, Reggie Jackson, etc. Peace.


Jeremy - 9183 Posts
09/06/2006 @ 07:49:03 PM
There would have to be another team willing to take him. Those other guys you listed had something left in the tank. I know this will just sound like me "taking a shot" at Favre but I honestly felt like many positives from last year were DESPITE Favre's efforts rather than because of them.
The Bengals game is a perfect example. Brett throws 5 picks yet the rest of the team hangs around with a team that was amongst football's best last year. They give him one last shot at redemption and he pulls a stunt that made you question if he even knew he was playing at the time.
The Bengals game is a perfect example. Brett throws 5 picks yet the rest of the team hangs around with a team that was amongst football's best last year. They give him one last shot at redemption and he pulls a stunt that made you question if he even knew he was playing at the time.
Jeremy screwed with this 3 times, last at 09/06/2006 10:41:55 pm


Scott - Get Up! Get outta here! Gone!
09/06/2006 @ 10:20:06 PM
the "collapse"?


Scott - 6053 Posts
09/06/2006 @ 10:32:54 PM
Michael Jordan? He had nothing in the tank when he played for the Wizards. He even went 0-20 in one game from the field. And Jerry Rice finally got cut by the Broncos. But the thing is, I have no problem with that. I see nothing wrong with a player retiring because he got cut. And I think given some better talent, Favre can still play at a pretty good level.


Jeremy - 9183 Posts
09/06/2006 @ 10:42:00 PM
I meant more when Jerry Rice officially left the 49ers and when Jordan left the Bulls they had something left. Not after they then proceeded to hang around 10 seasons after that point.


icbeast - 3429 Posts
09/06/2006 @ 11:00:08 PM
I'm so far behind here...
1st of all Ferguson would have no basis for complaining if I moved ahead of him on the depth chart. He's lucky just to be on the roster and I think he knows it.
Players have no allegience to teams anymore and teams have no allegience to players, therefore I reserve the right to cheer for players and teams when and if I feel like it. I've always thought that one should cheer for the home team unless given a significant reason not to, so you can pretty much mark me down as a fan of any Wisconsin team since I've to this point lived my entire life in the state. As long as Favre doesn't pull a TO to get off of the Packers I would probably still root for him.
Along those lines, I feel it necessary after Scott's comment to mention that there are certain lines that can't be crossed without consequences. Meaning that such traitors as Sharper are instantly dead to me when they go over to the dark side.
Favre had a terrible 1st half of the season, then he started to play better and everything else got worse. Anyway, new season tomorrow, time to stop living in the past.
1st of all Ferguson would have no basis for complaining if I moved ahead of him on the depth chart. He's lucky just to be on the roster and I think he knows it.
Players have no allegience to teams anymore and teams have no allegience to players, therefore I reserve the right to cheer for players and teams when and if I feel like it. I've always thought that one should cheer for the home team unless given a significant reason not to, so you can pretty much mark me down as a fan of any Wisconsin team since I've to this point lived my entire life in the state. As long as Favre doesn't pull a TO to get off of the Packers I would probably still root for him.
Along those lines, I feel it necessary after Scott's comment to mention that there are certain lines that can't be crossed without consequences. Meaning that such traitors as Sharper are instantly dead to me when they go over to the dark side.
Favre had a terrible 1st half of the season, then he started to play better and everything else got worse. Anyway, new season tomorrow, time to stop living in the past.
icbeast screwed with this 2 times, last at 09/06/2006 11:03:28 pm


Scott - Resident Tech Support
09/07/2006 @ 06:42:39 AM
I think the context of Favre saying that he could play for another team was if the Packers and he came to an understanding that the team wanted to go in another direction and that Favre would have to go elsewhere if he still wants to play. Like if Brad Johnson got hurt after this season and the Vikings needed a QB to put them over the top, Favre could go there and play:)


Jeremy - Robots don't say 'ye'
09/07/2006 @ 09:14:38 AM
I would sell my soul for that to happen. Not because I like Favre, but just to watch the suffering of everyone here in WI everytime he took the field.
It would totally be worth the 3-13 season.
It would totally be worth the 3-13 season.


Scott - 6053 Posts
09/07/2006 @ 11:44:46 AM
Gregg Jennings is ranked as the 4th best rookie. AJ Hawk is number 10.


Jeremy - 9183 Posts
09/07/2006 @ 01:53:29 PM
On the Packers? Ba-dum-cha.


Scott - 6053 Posts
09/08/2006 @ 06:36:03 AM
despite his yards, Culpepper looked pretty bad last night. He almost throw an INT in the endzone when Chris Chambers was hardly even being covered. Very "Favre-esque":)


Jeremy - 9183 Posts
09/08/2006 @ 08:46:21 AM
Yeah, he didn't look great. I suspect on the play you're talking about he expected Chambers to go out and up rather than just out. He threw the ball before Chambers "broke away."


Scott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings
09/08/2006 @ 10:33:10 AM
Chambers was also being held on the play, but either way that play cost me 7 points.


icbeast - 3429 Posts
09/08/2006 @ 12:33:49 PM
I suspect Chambers ran the right route. You can't run a deep out-post pattern from the 4 yard line. Has Culpepper always thrown sidearm? Well, I'm off to see if Charlie Batch is still available in our league...

Micah (Guest)
09/08/2006 @ 03:59:53 PM
I can't login...does my password need to be reset?
Micah (burningskulls)
Micah (burningskulls)


Jeremy - 9183 Posts
09/08/2006 @ 04:15:10 PM
its 12345


Jeremy - 1.21 Gigawatts!?!?
09/10/2006 @ 02:56:41 PM
The Lions deserved to win that game.


Scott - 6053 Posts
09/10/2006 @ 05:04:47 PM
that first half couldn't have been much worse. I guess the Pack has a good red zone defense?


Jeremy - 9183 Posts
09/10/2006 @ 05:48:40 PM
How the hell was that not pass interference on the Fergeson play?


Jeremy - Pie Racist
09/10/2006 @ 05:58:24 PM
Could Favre be anymore inaccurate?


Scott - 6053 Posts
09/10/2006 @ 06:17:53 PM
probably. This is going to be a long year


Jeremy - 9183 Posts
09/10/2006 @ 06:30:39 PM
Also, just because it's Nutcan protocol to argue with every Packer related comment I'll add this.
It probably could/should have been a lot worse.
It probably could/should have been a lot worse.


Scott - 6053 Posts
09/10/2006 @ 06:40:00 PM
limiting the Bears to 4 field goals was quite a feet in itself

Sarah (Guest)
09/10/2006 @ 06:44:34 PM
That was horrific. This could be the longest football season in the history of football. I mean good lord, we couldn't stop Rex Grossman, let along give him a season-ending injury. What gives? Our cornerbacks looked pathetic. Bright side: Ahman Green seemed to get 10 yards every time he touched the ball. (or something like that)


Scott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings
09/11/2006 @ 07:18:28 AM
Is there another "Reggie Bush" that the Packers can shoot to get with the top draft pick next year?


Jon - 3401 Posts
09/11/2006 @ 03:40:35 PM
I happened to be on the east side of Wisconsin on Sunday. I was just around Appleton at about 12:15 or 12:30 when all of the sudden we hear sirens. My friend, the driver, pulls over and we let the cops go by. But what the police were actually doing was escorting a bunch of coach buses. In the middle of the line of six or so buses was a black SUV with a Bears logo plastered on the back. We wondered if it could have been the team making their way to Lambeau. I assume that if it was, it was because they were staying near Appleton rather than in Green Bay. Anyway, ,that was kind of exciting for some reason.
As we drove west, we listened to a lot of football stuff and a lot of it was Packers stuff. At one point, some station played Bohoemian Rhapsody then followed it up with a Packerized version of that same song. My friend Michael correctly pointed out that it was made prior to their Super Bowl defeat season because they were talking about repeating and all that. Despite the fact that it was really lame, it was actually done pretty well and the tune is so familiar I didn't mind listening to it. The next song was Pearl Jam's Better Man. I joked after it finished that maybe there was a Packer version coming up right after that. Then I realized that it would probably work if they made a song like that about their quarterback.
My other thoughts about what I heard on the radio. People make all sorts of ridiculous statements. I heard one guy say the Bears didn't have any receivers. Now, they might not be a great corp, but Muhsin Muhammad is a pretty good receiver. They found that out though. Also, one guy commented on how he doesn't see any way the Bears don't win the north division. Really? It's just done before the season even starts? I wouldn't give that big a statement about any division before a single week has been finished. Certainly not one where the defending champs got about 100 yards of offense a game last season.
As we drove west, we listened to a lot of football stuff and a lot of it was Packers stuff. At one point, some station played Bohoemian Rhapsody then followed it up with a Packerized version of that same song. My friend Michael correctly pointed out that it was made prior to their Super Bowl defeat season because they were talking about repeating and all that. Despite the fact that it was really lame, it was actually done pretty well and the tune is so familiar I didn't mind listening to it. The next song was Pearl Jam's Better Man. I joked after it finished that maybe there was a Packer version coming up right after that. Then I realized that it would probably work if they made a song like that about their quarterback.
My other thoughts about what I heard on the radio. People make all sorts of ridiculous statements. I heard one guy say the Bears didn't have any receivers. Now, they might not be a great corp, but Muhsin Muhammad is a pretty good receiver. They found that out though. Also, one guy commented on how he doesn't see any way the Bears don't win the north division. Really? It's just done before the season even starts? I wouldn't give that big a statement about any division before a single week has been finished. Certainly not one where the defending champs got about 100 yards of offense a game last season.


Jeremy - I believe virtually everything I read.
09/11/2006 @ 04:08:19 PM
One time I bought a sandwich at Jimmy Johns and another lady walked out with it.


Scott - Get Up! Get outta here! Gone!
09/13/2006 @ 06:49:10 AM
The Packers are dead last in ESPN's week 2 power rankings. That's a first in my lifetime.


Jeremy - 9183 Posts
09/13/2006 @ 08:53:35 AM
Minnesota and Green Bay are at 11 and 26 Defensively as well as 15 and 21 respectively offensively.
Which begs the question how ESPN even has an argument to put the Packers below the Raiders in those rankings. The Packers racked up 267 yards on a defense said members of ESPN can't stop pontificating about and the Raiders got 121 yards, which is a slightly above average day for one runningback. In fact Ahman Green had 110 against those Bears.
The Packers looked bad, but at least there was some evidence they knew what a football was. The Raiders were just flat out pathetic.
Which begs the question how ESPN even has an argument to put the Packers below the Raiders in those rankings. The Packers racked up 267 yards on a defense said members of ESPN can't stop pontificating about and the Raiders got 121 yards, which is a slightly above average day for one runningback. In fact Ahman Green had 110 against those Bears.
The Packers looked bad, but at least there was some evidence they knew what a football was. The Raiders were just flat out pathetic.


Scott - You're going to have to call your hardware guy. It's not a software issue.
09/13/2006 @ 09:06:28 AM
Are you actually defending the Packers?!? What's next? Brett Favre is underrated?


Jeremy - Always thinking of, but never about, the children.
09/13/2006 @ 09:28:49 AM
It's still early in the season, I have one or two rational thoughts still floating around.


Alex - 3429 Posts
09/13/2006 @ 02:19:02 PM
I'm pretty sure my high flag football team could beat the Raiders at this point.


Jeremy - Broadcast in stunning 1080i
09/13/2006 @ 02:34:09 PM
Did you mean your high school flag football team or a current, drug addicted, flag football team?


Sarah - So's your face
09/13/2006 @ 05:20:35 PM
SAMKON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! no!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WHY? WHY? WHY? STUPID TEXANS!!!!
oh and liriano is out for the year with the
possibility of Tommy John surgery.... discuss
WHY? WHY? WHY? STUPID TEXANS!!!!
oh and liriano is out for the year with the
possibility of Tommy John surgery.... discuss


Scott - You're going to have to call your hardware guy. It's not a software issue.
09/13/2006 @ 05:31:18 PM
everyone but matt is on right now. crazy.


Scott - 6053 Posts
09/13/2006 @ 05:33:03 PM
19 guests online right now!!!


Alex - You've got to trust your instinct, and let go of regret
09/13/2006 @ 06:19:26 PM
I meant high school, but option 2 is also a distinct possibility.


Alex - You've got to trust your instinct, and let go of regret
09/13/2006 @ 06:20:08 PM
When do next weeks picks become available?


Jeremy - No one's gay for Moleman
09/13/2006 @ 08:14:33 PM
To do them? You already can. Scott and I have. Make your picks here I should put that in the menu. Should it just be the first thing in the nflpicks "module"?
Leave a Comment of your very own
Name: | |||
Comment: | |||
| |||


Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.
Dolphins 17 @ Steelers 28
Jeremy
Oh Daunte, why have you forsaken me! If Someone told you after the Superbowl that this game would be a battle between Charlie Batch and Daunte Culpepper I think you may have had that person committed.Matt
Football sucks.Jon
First a few things. I was reminded today that Roethlisberger has only been in the league two years. Doesn't it seem like he's been around longer than that? I mean three years ago basically no one knew who this guy was. Second, do you remember that HE made that tackle that saved their season last year? What a career already. Eli Manning was drafted the same year this guy was. I'm not bringing this up for any specific reason other than it seems interesting to me. Now to the game. I thought I was going to pick the dolphins, but it still seems like a little much to expect them to win this.Sarah
With Ben out with a NFI, I think Culpepper and the Dolphins(!) will triumph. In either case, I will be watching because it's the start of the season!!!