Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
These are not our most current picks! Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2025 Season Week 1 Picks.
NFL 2007 Season Week 14 Picks
Bears 16 @ Commanders 24
Final
Thu, 12/6/07 7:00pm
10 Picks - 53%
9 Picks - 47%
Bears
Bears
Commanders
Commanders
Panthers 6 @ Jaguars 37
Final
Sun, 12/9/07 12:00pm
0 Picks - 0%
22 Picks - 100%
Jaguars
Jaguars
Jaguars
Jaguars
Dolphins 17 @ Bills 38
Final
Sun, 12/9/07 12:00pm
2 Picks - 9%
20 Picks - 91%
Bills
Bills
Bills
Bills
Chargers 23 @ Titans 17
F / OT
Sun, 12/9/07 12:00pm
13 Picks - 59%
9 Picks - 41%
Chargers
Chargers
Titans
Chargers
Buccaneers 14 @ Texans 28
Final
Sun, 12/9/07 12:00pm
19 Picks - 86%
3 Picks - 14%
Buccaneers
Buccaneers
Buccaneers
Texans
Raiders 7 @ Packers 38
Final
Sun, 12/9/07 12:00pm
1 Pick - 5%
21 Picks - 95%
Packers
Raiders
Packers
Packers
Cowboys 28 @ Lions 27
Final
Sun, 12/9/07 12:00pm
20 Picks - 91%
2 Picks - 9%
Cowboys
Cowboys
Cowboys
Cowboys
Giants 16 @ Eagles 13
Final
Sun, 12/9/07 12:00pm
13 Picks - 59%
9 Picks - 41%
Giants
Giants
Giants
Eagles
Rams 10 @ Bengals 19
Final
Sun, 12/9/07 12:00pm
4 Picks - 18%
18 Picks - 82%
Bengals
Bengals
Bengals
Bengals
Cardinals 21 @ Seahawks 42
Final
Sun, 12/9/07 3:05pm
1 Pick - 5%
21 Picks - 95%
Seahawks
Seahawks
Seahawks
Seahawks
Vikings 27 @ 49ers 7
Final
Sun, 12/9/07 3:05pm
21 Picks - 95%
1 Pick - 5%
Vikings
Vikings
Vikings
Vikings
Chiefs 7 @ Broncos 41
Final
Sun, 12/9/07 3:15pm
2 Picks - 9%
20 Picks - 91%
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Broncos
Steelers 13 @ Patriots 34
Final
Sun, 12/9/07 3:15pm
7 Picks - 32%
15 Picks - 68%
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Patriots
Browns 24 @ Jets 18
Final
Sun, 12/9/07 3:15pm
20 Picks - 91%
2 Picks - 9%
Browns
Jets
Browns
Browns
Colts 44 @ Ravens 20
Final
Sun, 12/9/07 7:15pm
22 Picks - 100%
0 Picks - 0%
Colts
Colts
Colts
Colts
Saints 34 @ Falcons 14
Final
Mon, 12/10/07 7:30pm
20 Picks - 91%
2 Picks - 9%
Saints
Saints
Saints
Saints
Week Record:
14 - 20.875
Season Record:
135 - 730.649
No-Pack-Vike Record:
880 - 4830.646
Lifetime Record:
977 - 5650.634
Week Record:
12 - 40.750
Season Record:
125 - 830.601
No-Pack-Vike Record:
806 - 5570.591
Lifetime Record:
888 - 6540.576
Week Record:
14 - 20.875
Season Record:
138 - 700.663
No-Pack-Vike Record:
871 - 4920.639
Lifetime Record:
958 - 5840.621
Week Record:
15 - 10.938
Season Record:
143 - 650.688
No-Pack-Vike Record:
857 - 5060.629
Lifetime Record:
954 - 5880.619
Commanders
Jaguars
Bills
Chargers
Buccaneers
Packers
Cowboys
Eagles
Bengals
Seahawks
Vikings
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 14 - 2 0.875 |
| Season: | 131 - 77 0.630 |
| Lifetime: | 300 - 175 0.632 |
Commanders
Jaguars
Bills
Titans
Buccaneers
Packers
Cowboys
Eagles
Rams
Seahawks
49ers
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
| Season: | 133 - 75 0.639 |
| Lifetime: | 283 - 191 0.597 |
Bears
Jaguars
Bills
Titans
Texans
Packers
Cowboys
Eagles
Bengals
Seahawks
Vikings
Broncos
Steelers
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
| Season: | 131 - 77 0.630 |
| Lifetime: | 288 - 184 0.610 |
Bears
Jaguars
Bills
Chargers
Buccaneers
Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Bengals
Seahawks
Vikings
Broncos
Steelers
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
| Season: | 133 - 75 0.639 |
| Lifetime: | 133 - 75 0.639 |
Commanders
Jaguars
Bills
Chargers
Buccaneers
Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Bengals
Seahawks
Vikings
Chiefs
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 14 - 2 0.875 |
| Season: | 128 - 80 0.615 |
| Lifetime: | 128 - 80 0.615 |
Jaguars
Bills
Chargers
Buccaneers
Packers
Cowboys
Eagles
Bengals
Seahawks
Vikings
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Falcons
| Week: | 12 - 3 0.800 |
| Season: | 102 - 62 0.622 |
| Lifetime: | 102 - 62 0.622 |
Commanders
Jaguars
Bills
Titans
Buccaneers
Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Rams
Seahawks
Vikings
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
| Season: | 126 - 68 0.649 |
| Lifetime: | 126 - 68 0.649 |
Commanders
Jaguars
Dolphins
Titans
Buccaneers
Packers
Lions
Eagles
Bengals
Seahawks
Vikings
Broncos
Steelers
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
| Season: | 88 - 58 0.603 |
| Lifetime: | 88 - 58 0.603 |
Bears
Jaguars
Bills
Chargers
Texans
Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Bengals
Seahawks
Vikings
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 15 - 1 0.938 |
| Season: | 107 - 39 0.733 |
| Lifetime: | 107 - 39 0.733 |
Commanders
Jaguars
Bills
Titans
Buccaneers
Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Rams
Seahawks
Vikings
Broncos
Steelers
Browns
Colts
Falcons
| Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
| Season: | 54 - 37 0.593 |
| Lifetime: | 54 - 37 0.593 |
Bears
Jaguars
Bills
Titans
Buccaneers
Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Bengals
Seahawks
Vikings
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
| Season: | 64 - 28 0.696 |
| Lifetime: | 64 - 28 0.696 |
Bears
Jaguars
Dolphins
Chargers
Buccaneers
Packers
Cowboys
Eagles
Bengals
Seahawks
Vikings
Chiefs
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 11 - 5 0.688 |
| Season: | 38 - 22 0.633 |
| Lifetime: | 38 - 22 0.633 |
Commanders
Jaguars
Bills
Chargers
Buccaneers
Packers
Cowboys
Eagles
Bengals
Seahawks
Vikings
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 14 - 2 0.875 |
| Season: | 49 - 29 0.628 |
| Lifetime: | 49 - 29 0.628 |
Bears
Jaguars
Bills
Chargers
Buccaneers
Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Bengals
Seahawks
Vikings
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 14 - 2 0.875 |
| Season: | 49 - 29 0.628 |
| Lifetime: | 49 - 29 0.628 |
Jaguars
Bills
Titans
Buccaneers
Packers
Lions
Giants
Rams
Cardinals
Vikings
Broncos
Steelers
Jets
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 8 - 7 0.533 |
| Season: | 33 - 28 0.541 |
| Lifetime: | 33 - 28 0.541 |
Jaguars
Bills
Titans
Buccaneers
Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Bengals
Seahawks
Vikings
Broncos
Steelers
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 12 - 3 0.800 |
| Season: | 42 - 19 0.689 |
| Lifetime: | 42 - 19 0.689 |
Bears
Jaguars
Bills
Chargers
Buccaneers
Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Bengals
Seahawks
Vikings
Broncos
Steelers
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
| Season: | 43 - 21 0.672 |
| Lifetime: | 43 - 21 0.672 |
Bears
Jaguars
Bills
Chargers
Buccaneers
Packers
Cowboys
Eagles
Bengals
Seahawks
Vikings
Broncos
Patriots
Browns
Colts
Saints
| Week: | 13 - 3 0.812 |
| Season: | 47 - 17 0.734 |
| Lifetime: | 47 - 17 0.734 |
 | Raiders 7 @ Packers 38 |  |
 | JeremyIf the Packers lose this game then all bets are off. The Vikings turned the ball over like 7 million times and still beat the Raiders. The Raiders are just an awful awful team. |
 | SarahIt's been a long time since I've seen some Packer football. Favre's winning of the Sportsman of the Year got me thinking. Maybe he didn't have the best year out of everyone, but he did break a lot a records. MVP MVP MVP MVP |
 | MattThe Raiders are on a roll. Oakland 27, Green Bay 21 |
 | JonPackers' losing streak continues? Probably not, but it wouldn't hurt. |
 | Vikings 27 @ 49ers 7 |  |
| JeremyThe Vikings average margin of victory is 17.5 points. Their average margin of loss is 10.67. Factor out their best and worst games and it's 14.6 and 6 respectively. A few weeks ago the Giants and Lions looked like locks for the two wildcard spots. The Vikings outscored them by a combined 52 points. They held the Cowboys, who were at home, to fewer points than anyone all season. What am I trying to say here? Perhaps the 0-34 Packer game was the anomaly, and not the crushing of the Chargers, Lions, and Giants, who could all be playoff teams. Everything seems to be falling into place for the Vikes to make their annual run at being the best team to not make the playoffs, costing themselves about 12 spots in the draft in the process. |
| SarahThe Vikings are back in the playoff hunt. |
| MattRay Edwards is not here to talk about the past. |
| JonMinnesota is the hot team! So they'll probably lose. Still, they've sure become quite the high scoring team again. |
 | Colts 44 @ Ravens 20 |  |
| JeremyOh those poor Ravens. Boy, did they get hosed. |
| SarahStupid Ravens. |
| MattP-Man for MVP!!!! |
| JonThe NFL has decided the Colts will win this, right? |
 | Saints 34 @ Falcons 14 |  |
| JeremyI'm sure going into the season this game seemed like a good idea. |
| SarahI was sooo tempted to pick the Steelers. |
| MattPass |
| JonNo one wants to watch this. Actually, I'd maybe watch if I wasn't busy Monday night. |
Jfk10intex - 224 Posts
12/05/2007 @ 07:17:15 AM
lol.... steelers???? why did u put that in the saints @ falcons game?
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
RUFiO1984 - I put my socks on the wrong feet.
12/05/2007 @ 07:30:44 AM
Jfk10intex Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 07:17:15 AM
lol.... steelers???? why did u put that in the saints @ falcons game?
possibly doesnt care for the saints or falcons enough to comment on them, So talked about a different game!! :)
Yours:
Total:
Rated 2 times.
Total:
Rated 2 times.
Carlos44ec - 2038 Posts
12/05/2007 @ 07:54:00 AM
Or she could have put the wrong comment in the box, but I think she was commenting on the game being so damned boring that she would be watching the Steelers? That is my bet.
FYI I took the Packers to the Raiders in Madden 2k5. 98-0. I then took the Packers to the Bills, 118-6 (missed extra point). Favre had a combined 1500 passing yards in those games.
FYI I took the Packers to the Raiders in Madden 2k5. 98-0. I then took the Packers to the Bills, 118-6 (missed extra point). Favre had a combined 1500 passing yards in those games.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Carlos44ec screwed with this at 12/05/2007 7:55:05 am
Sarah (Guest)
12/05/2007 @ 09:11:12 AM
RUFiO1984 Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 07:30:44 AM
Jfk10intex Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 07:17:15 AM
possibly doesnt care for the saints or falcons enough to comment on them, So talked about a different game!! :)lol.... steelers???? why did u put that in the saints @ falcons game?
Bingo Bango!
Hi from Florida!
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Scott - Get Up! Get outta here! Gone!
12/05/2007 @ 11:41:05 AM
Hi
Yours:
Total:
Rated 2 times.
Total:
Rated 2 times.
Jeremy - 9183 Posts
12/05/2007 @ 11:43:28 AM
Screw you guys, I have to go snow blower shopping tonight. Incidentally, is "Snow Blower" a regional thing, because everyone else (especially businesses) seems to call them "Snow Throwers."
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Scott - 6053 Posts
12/05/2007 @ 11:50:35 AM
Who's everyone else? I always thought they were called snow blowers. "Snow Thrower" sounds more like the person in your snow ball fighting squad who has the best arm. Tell that to the next person that tries to sell you a "snow thrower".
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Scott - 6053 Posts
12/05/2007 @ 12:24:40 PM
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Scott edited this at 12/05/2007 12:29:22 pm
Jeremy - The pig says "My wife is a slut?"
12/05/2007 @ 12:33:03 PM
I had to refresh the page a couple times to actually get Hasselbeck's, it was pretty funny, I guess. I think that kind of stuff goes on all the time though.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 2 times.
Total:
Rated 2 times.
Scott - If you aren't enough without it, you'll never be enough with it.
12/05/2007 @ 12:48:18 PM
probably. Some of the videos are fairly funny, some are just weird.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Alex - But let history remember, that as free men, we chose to make it so!
12/05/2007 @ 12:56:08 PM
I partially picked the 49ers just cause they're not the Vikings, but I was suprised to see I'm the only one out of 14 so far to do so. I think Jeremy is switching people's picks when they're not looking...
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Scott - 6053 Posts
12/05/2007 @ 01:50:40 PM
Well, from what I see, Jeremy did pick the Packers.
My feeling with the Vikings right now is this: Which Vikings team with show up. Will it the team that got blown out by the Packers, or will it be the team that crushed the Giants and the Lions? I think we're more likely to see something closer to the former from here on out, which is why I really hope the Vikings don't make the playoffs. They are one of a few teams that I really would rather not have to face again. (that list probably includes the Giants as well).
My feeling with the Vikings right now is this: Which Vikings team with show up. Will it the team that got blown out by the Packers, or will it be the team that crushed the Giants and the Lions? I think we're more likely to see something closer to the former from here on out, which is why I really hope the Vikings don't make the playoffs. They are one of a few teams that I really would rather not have to face again. (that list probably includes the Giants as well).
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Jeremy - 9183 Posts
12/05/2007 @ 02:47:06 PM
The Packers game was a catalyst for some defensive changes the players have been bugging the coaches to make all season, so far so good on those. I forget the details, I think the gist was that the "Stand in our zones and watch the other team play catch 'Cover 2'" had to go. They've looked like a different team since then, not to mention T-Jack is playing better too.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 3 times.
Total:
Rated 3 times.
Jfk10intex - My computer is better than yours!!!!
12/05/2007 @ 03:02:39 PM
Alex Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 12:56:08 PM
I partially picked the 49ers just cause they're not the Vikings, but I was suprised to see I'm the only one out of 14 so far to do so. I think Jeremy is switching people's picks when they're not looking...
your kidding right???? if not thats the stupidest comment i have read on the site so far =
Yours:
Total:
Rated 3 times.
Total:
Rated 3 times.
Matt - Ombudsman
12/05/2007 @ 03:03:07 PM
Scott Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 01:50:40 PM
Well, from what I see, Jeremy did pick the Packers. My feeling with the Vikings right now is this: Which Vikings team with show up. Will it the team that got blown out by the Packers, or will it be the team that crushed the Giants and the Lions? I think we're more likely to see something closer to the former from here on out, which is why I really hope the Vikings don't make the playoffs. They are one of a few teams that I really would rather not have to face again. (that list probably includes the Giants as well).
So you don't want to play the Vikings again, because you think they are going to start playing badly again?
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Jfk10intex - 224 Posts
12/05/2007 @ 03:04:16 PM
Matt Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 03:03:07 PM
Scott Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 01:50:40 PM
So you don't want to play the Vikings again, because you think they are going to start playing badly again?Well, from what I see, Jeremy did pick the Packers. My feeling with the Vikings right now is this: Which Vikings team with show up. Will it the team that got blown out by the Packers, or will it be the team that crushed the Giants and the Lions? I think we're more likely to see something closer to the former from here on out, which is why I really hope the Vikings don't make the playoffs. They are one of a few teams that I really would rather not have to face again. (that list probably includes the Giants as well).
no he doesnt want to play them cause they will lose to the vikings..... the vikings have found their way and they look good..
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Matt - 3845 Posts
12/05/2007 @ 03:05:15 PM
Jfk10intex Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 03:02:39 PM
if not thats the stupidest comment i have read on the site so far =
Words escape me at the moment.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Matt messed with this at 12/05/2007 3:05:32 pm
Matt - Nutcan.com's MBL
12/05/2007 @ 03:06:53 PM
Brett Favre hates kids. Some Sportsman of the Year he is.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 2 times.
Total:
Rated 2 times.
Jfk10intex - 224 Posts
12/05/2007 @ 03:08:06 PM
and he has kid(s).... so i dont think he hates them..................
Matt Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 03:05:15 PM
Jfk10intex Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 03:02:39 PM
Words escape me at the moment.if not thats the stupidest comment i have read on the site so far =
close the door and that wont happen....
Yours:
Total:
Rated 3 times.
Total:
Rated 3 times.
Jeremy - I hate our freedoms
12/05/2007 @ 03:17:43 PM
Can someone tell me why if the playoffs started today the Cardinals would get in over the Vikings. The standings seem to say otherwise. Is it some lame 3-way-tie rule?
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Jeremy screwed with this at 12/05/2007 3:19:48 pm
Matt - 3845 Posts
12/05/2007 @ 03:35:52 PM
Going by this, since its a 3-way tie and the Vikings and Lions are in the same division, divisional tie-breakers apply first between them and the "winner" then goes to the tiebreak w/the Cardinals. Since the Lions and Vikings split, it goes to best winning percentage in division games, which the Lions have the advantage in.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Matt screwed with this 2 times, last at 12/05/2007 3:47:43 pm
Jeremy - Broadcast in stunning 1080i
12/05/2007 @ 03:45:54 PM
Gotcha, luckily for us the Lions have a pretty rough schedule, or at least teams that can be tough. Green Bay might not have anything to play for.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Scott - 6053 Posts
12/05/2007 @ 03:50:37 PM
Luckily for the rest of us the Vikings actually suck. Ha, watcha think about that. 
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Alex - Ignorance is bliss to those uneducated
12/05/2007 @ 06:58:51 PM
Jeremy Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 02:47:06 PM
The Packers game was a catalyst for some defensive changes the players have been bugging the coaches to make all season, so far so good on those. I forget the details, I think the gist was that the "Stand in our zones and watch the other team play catch 'Cover 2'" had to go. They've looked like a different team since then, not to mention T-Jack is playing better too.
Whilst I don't doubt the validitity of your analysis, they've also played 2 home games against terrible and/or terrible on the road teams and also had Eli pretty much gift wrap and put a cherry on top of the other game. I'd just hate to see all the Vikings fans get their hopes up only to be dashed when they can't win on the road in Denver. Wait, forget I said anything, I'm sure the Vikings have been a juggernaut in disguise all year long.
Actually I can see the Lions ending up 7-9 and the Vikings and Cardinals both going 8-8. Which might leave the door open for my mid-season pick of New Orleans to slide in at 8-8 as well. And I'm thinking the Saints will beat the Cardinals so they're out, and then the Saints will be 7-5 in conference and the Vikings will 6-6 so the Saints will get it. If I'm at all reading the tiebreaker logic correctly, which is a big if.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Jeremy - Always thinking of, but never about, the children.
12/05/2007 @ 10:44:02 PM
Chris Collinsworth said on Inside the NFL that the Vikings are the team he would LEAST want to have to play in the playoffs, so take that for what it's worth along my line of questioning earlier.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 3 times.
Total:
Rated 3 times.
Sarah (Guest)
12/05/2007 @ 10:45:12 PM
The Vikings aren't that great of a team, I just don't think T-Jack is the answer.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 3 times.
Total:
Rated 3 times.
Sarah (Guest)
12/05/2007 @ 10:51:08 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3143128
A-Rod hurt himself in practice. This is why I don't like him. (and then some.) He's out for 2 weeks. Favre should be ready to go.
A-Rod hurt himself in practice. This is why I don't like him. (and then some.) He's out for 2 weeks. Favre should be ready to go.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 2 times.
Total:
Rated 2 times.
Jfk10intex - 224 Posts
12/06/2007 @ 07:31:05 AM
lol A-Rod hurt himself in practice!!!!!!! Boy we are going to be fudged when Brett Favre leaves the packers and he is QB..... who hurts themselves in practice who????? Let us all recall that the Vikings were scoreless against the Green Bay Packers.... and happen to be the only team that Green Bay shut out.... that game right there... should tell u the outcome of any playoff games they play and/or and btw..... MATT...... ur ignorance i find distrubing.... the raiders will get whooped... i mean lets get real here.... lets be honest with urself.... u know the packers are going to win but maybe matt just wanted a little extra attention cause mommy didnt give him enough attention when he was a little boy. am i right=]
Yours:
Total:
Rated 4 times.
Total:
Rated 4 times.
Carlos44ec - Tag This
12/06/2007 @ 08:03:24 AM
Jfk10intex Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 07:31:05 AM
...maybe matt just wanted a little extra attention cause mommy didnt give him enough attention when he was a little boy. am i right=]
I wonder- is it hard being this much of a prick to people you don't know, or is it easier because the internet makes you anonymous?
At any rate, if Matt is truly ignorant- and I highly doubt that- are you trying to make up for it in overconfidence and arrogance?
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Carlos44ec edited this at 12/06/2007 8:04:27 am
Jeremy - Cube Phenomenoligist
12/06/2007 @ 09:24:07 AM
Matt just never picks the Packers. I'm sure he doesn't think the Raiders will win.
Also players get hurt in practice all the time. Probably more so than in games, especially if you count training camp.
Also players get hurt in practice all the time. Probably more so than in games, especially if you count training camp.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Carlos44ec - 2038 Posts
12/06/2007 @ 10:31:12 AM
I hurt myself in track practice in middle school. came out of the "blocks" wrong and hurt the knee.
Don't worry, it feels better now...
Don't worry, it feels better now...
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
RUFiO1984 - 216 Posts
12/06/2007 @ 10:59:43 AM
Carlos44ec Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 10:31:12 AM
I hurt myself in track practice in middle school. came out of the "blocks" wrong and hurt the knee. Don't worry, it feels better now...
I find this hilarious for some reason.
Carlos44ec Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 08:03:24 AM
Jfk10intex Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 07:31:05 AM
I wonder- is it hard being this much of a prick to people you don't know, or is it easier because the internet makes you anonymous? At any rate, if Matt is truly ignorant- and I highly doubt that- are you trying to make up for it in overconfidence and arrogance? ...maybe matt just wanted a little extra attention cause mommy didnt give him enough attention when he was a little boy. am i right=]
seems like he is the one who didnt get enough attention.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Jeremy - I believe virtually everything I read.
12/06/2007 @ 11:39:28 AM
RUFiO1984 Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 10:59:43 AM
I find this hilarious for some reason.
seems like he is the one who didnt get enough attention.
Carlos44ec Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 10:31:12 AM
I hurt myself in track practice in middle school. came out of the "blocks" wrong and hurt the knee. Don't worry, it feels better now...
I find this hilarious for some reason.
Carlos44ec Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 08:03:24 AM
Jfk10intex Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 07:31:05 AM
I wonder- is it hard being this much of a prick to people you don't know, or is it easier because the internet makes you anonymous? At any rate, if Matt is truly ignorant- and I highly doubt that- are you trying to make up for it in overconfidence and arrogance? ...maybe matt just wanted a little extra attention cause mommy didnt give him enough attention when he was a little boy. am i right=]
seems like he is the one who didnt get enough attention.
He certainly didn't get enough attention from his English teachers.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
premierdj
12/06/2007 @ 12:20:06 PM
OMG! Jeremy, I've never claimed to be the world's most intelligent human being, but trying to make quick sense of the cluster-quote you left gives me a migraine!
Anyways, if it hasn't been stated enough - I hate the damn NFL Network. I know, I know. "Get out of the house and go see it at a bar or something" - Well, you try telling that to all the damn bar owners who are too damn cheap to pay $10 a month - eventhough they're charging like $5 a beer.
Forget COMMUNISM, the NFL NETWORK is a red herring!
Anyways, if it hasn't been stated enough - I hate the damn NFL Network. I know, I know. "Get out of the house and go see it at a bar or something" - Well, you try telling that to all the damn bar owners who are too damn cheap to pay $10 a month - eventhough they're charging like $5 a beer.
Forget COMMUNISM, the NFL NETWORK is a red herring!
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Scott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings
12/06/2007 @ 12:40:31 PM
Also, Bryant Gumble is by far the worst sportscaster that ever lived. Who gave this guy the job? No wonder the cable companies won't carry this network. They want to spare us all from his idiocy his his seemingly lack of interest in the sport of football.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Alex - 3429 Posts
12/06/2007 @ 01:11:08 PM
Scott Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 12:40:31 PM
Also, Bryant Gumble is by far the worst sportscaster that ever lived. Who gave this guy the job? No wonder the cable companies won't carry this network. They want to spare us all from his idiocy his his seemingly lack of interest in the sport of football.
Word. You could give commentary in the dark and still end up saying the right team/player/play etc. more often than he does. Unbearable. Thank you Time Warner! Now just add the Big Ten channel and we'll call it even.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Jeremy - Pie Racist
12/06/2007 @ 01:21:40 PM
I'm not so sure you understand what "red herring" means.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Jeremy - Broadcast in stunning 1080i
12/06/2007 @ 01:22:28 PM
Alex Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 01:11:08 PM
Word. You could give commentary in the dark and still end up saying the right team/player/play etc. more often than he does. Unbearable. Thank you Time Warner! Now just add the Big Ten channel and we'll call it even.
Scott Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 12:40:31 PM
Also, Bryant Gumble is by far the worst sportscaster that ever lived. Who gave this guy the job? No wonder the cable companies won't carry this network. They want to spare us all from his idiocy his his seemingly lack of interest in the sport of football.
Word. You could give commentary in the dark and still end up saying the right team/player/play etc. more often than he does. Unbearable. Thank you Time Warner! Now just add the Big Ten channel and we'll call it even.
I've said this for ages.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Jeremy - Cube Phenomenoligist
12/06/2007 @ 01:35:50 PM
Also, to complement my comments on the Vikings game I figured out the Packers Margin of Victory is 11.8 and Margin of loss is 8.5. Factoring out their best and worst you get 10.3 and 7 (the 7 is one remaining loss). So obviously it's meaningless, but the Vikings have won by more and lost by less, which doesn't seem like it could be right.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
customshopkv1
12/06/2007 @ 02:18:56 PM
premierdj Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 12:20:06 PM
OMG! Jeremy, I've never claimed to be the world's most intelligent human being, but trying to make quick sense of the cluster-quote you left gives me a migraine! Anyways, if it hasn't been stated enough - I hate the damn NFL Network. I know, I know. "Get out of the house and go see it at a bar or something" - Well, you try telling that to all the damn bar owners who are too damn cheap to pay $10 a month - eventhough they're charging like $5 a beer. Forget COMMUNISM, the NFL NETWORK is a red herring!
You get it with direct tv
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Carlos44ec - 2038 Posts
12/06/2007 @ 02:31:16 PM
With the smoking ban in MN, I was able to watch the Packers/Cowboys game without choking to death. It was more comfortable than last year's packers playoff game where I had to watch at DoubleDays in a haze of cigarette (and pot) smoke.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Jeremy - 9183 Posts
12/06/2007 @ 05:55:28 PM
Chris Collinsworth says the Vikings are the team he'd least want to face in the NFC playoffs. Tons of articles are being written about their sudden ascension. Espn is predicting the Vikings 44-13 this weekend. It sure doesn't take long for sport writers to fire up the bandwagon.
It will be interesting to see how quickly it changes when they inevitably lay an egg in San Fran.
It will be interesting to see how quickly it changes when they inevitably lay an egg in San Fran.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Scott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings
12/06/2007 @ 07:08:04 PM
Jeremy Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 01:22:28 PM
Alex Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 01:11:08 PM
I've said this for ages.Scott Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 12:40:31 PM
Word. You could give commentary in the dark and still end up saying the right team/player/play etc. more often than he does. Unbearable. Thank you Time Warner! Now just add the Big Ten channel and we'll call it even.Also, Bryant Gumble is by far the worst sportscaster that ever lived. Who gave this guy the job? No wonder the cable companies won't carry this network. They want to spare us all from his idiocy his his seemingly lack of interest in the sport of football.
I need documented proof. I don't recall.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Alex - You've got to trust your instinct, and let go of regret
12/06/2007 @ 08:29:04 PM
Jeremy Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 05:55:28 PM
Chris Collinsworth says the Vikings are the team he'd least want to face in the NFC playoffs. Tons of articles are being written about their sudden ascension. Espn is predicting the Vikings 44-13 this weekend. It sure doesn't take long for sport writers to fire up the bandwagon. It will be interesting to see how quickly it changes when they inevitably lay an egg in San Fran.
In the Metrodome maybe. Which the Packers don't have to worry about. Even still he can't be serious. What about Dallas?
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
PackOne - She's got the whole wide world singing baby's song.
12/06/2007 @ 09:12:06 PM
Scott Wrote - 12/05/2007 @ 03:50:37 PM
Luckily for the rest of us the Vikings actually suck. Ha, watcha think about that. 
Thats's what I call a five tree'er.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Jeremy - 9183 Posts
12/06/2007 @ 10:02:04 PM
Scott Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 07:08:04 PM
I need documented proof. I don't recall.
Jeremy Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 01:22:28 PM
Alex Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 01:11:08 PM
I've said this for ages.Scott Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 12:40:31 PM
Word. You could give commentary in the dark and still end up saying the right team/player/play etc. more often than he does. Unbearable. Thank you Time Warner! Now just add the Big Ten channel and we'll call it even.Also, Bryant Gumble is by far the worst sportscaster that ever lived. Who gave this guy the job? No wonder the cable companies won't carry this network. They want to spare us all from his idiocy his his seemingly lack of interest in the sport of football.
I need documented proof. I don't recall.
I don't think we've ever talked about him on the site, I've just never liked him and I think we had pretty much this exact same conversation while we watch the game.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Scott - Get Up! Get outta here! Gone!
12/07/2007 @ 07:50:02 AM
ESPN agrees with Jeremy. I can't say I disagree though, to a certain extent. Again, it comes down to which Vikings team decides to show up. Because they have definitely been a very different team at different times in the season.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Jeremy - 9183 Posts
12/07/2007 @ 09:08:09 AM
Well first off I wouldn't say ESPN "agrees with Jeremy" because Jeremy has just been passing along what ESPN has been saying about them, for the most part. I do think your whole "depends with team shows up" thing is a bit unfair, because as I showed up above the 0-34 game was the anomaly, outside of that their largest loss is 10 to the Cowboys, which came off a blocked filed goal. That Packer game was played against the 3rd string QB and had Adrian Peterson getting assassinated a little after halftime a week after he ran for 250 yards in the second half. It's not as if the Vikings either win by 20 or lose by 20, they've been winning big and barely losing all season, outside of that one game.
Edit: I've been saying all season they would be a force to be reckoned with if they could even count on below average Quarterbacking and Jackson has stepped it up as of recent. If Jackson keeps it up they could do a lot of damage. Teams that can stop the run, and run at will, always have the potential to shake things up in the playoffs.
Edit 2: Please to note, I personally am not making a case for the Vikings making a Superbowl run. The scope of this conversation is merely based on the question, "Would you be scared to play the Vikings in the post season?"
Edit: I've been saying all season they would be a force to be reckoned with if they could even count on below average Quarterbacking and Jackson has stepped it up as of recent. If Jackson keeps it up they could do a lot of damage. Teams that can stop the run, and run at will, always have the potential to shake things up in the playoffs.
Edit 2: Please to note, I personally am not making a case for the Vikings making a Superbowl run. The scope of this conversation is merely based on the question, "Would you be scared to play the Vikings in the post season?"
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Jeremy perfected this 4 times, last at 12/07/2007 9:16:22 am
Scott - 6053 Posts
12/08/2007 @ 08:24:51 AM
Isn't me admitting that I'd be a little scared to face the Vikings progress enough?
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
jthompto - 209 Posts
12/08/2007 @ 01:51:29 PM
It all comes down to this Jackson is the right type of Quarterback for this system. The Vikings are 6-2 when he starts and 0-4 when he doesn't start. The 2 starts he lost were the ovetime loss against Detroit where he was hurt in OT and Bollinger came in and turned the ball over giving the Lions good field position for a field goal and against the Cowboys where a blocked field goal and an AP fumble were the difference in the game. He isn't a superstar yet, but he seems to be doing all the right things when he is healthy.
I think what the writers are saying, is out of the lower tier NFC teams (everyone except Dallas and Green Bay) the Vikings are the most likely to pull of an upset. Tampa Bay, Seattle, Detroit, Arizona, Washington, New Orleans, don't really scare me that much if I am a Cowboys or Packers fan.
I agree the Vikings will not win the superbowl, but they do have a chance to make the playoffs and possibly win one game.
I think what the writers are saying, is out of the lower tier NFC teams (everyone except Dallas and Green Bay) the Vikings are the most likely to pull of an upset. Tampa Bay, Seattle, Detroit, Arizona, Washington, New Orleans, don't really scare me that much if I am a Cowboys or Packers fan.
I agree the Vikings will not win the superbowl, but they do have a chance to make the playoffs and possibly win one game.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Jfk10intex - 224 Posts
12/08/2007 @ 09:17:43 PM
FYI: I Get plenty of attention from my english teachers and anyone else from that matter... i said that because it seems Matt was trying to be different from everyone else so he could be in the spotlight.....just a hypothesis..... don't need to be pounded on for making one critical assumption...
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Jon - 3401 Posts
12/09/2007 @ 08:57:27 AM
jthompto Wrote - 12/08/2007 @ 01:51:29 PM
It all comes down to this Jackson is the right type of Quarterback for this system. The Vikings are 6-2 when he starts and 0-4 when he doesn't start. The 2 starts he lost were the ovetime loss against Detroit where he was hurt in OT and Bollinger came in and turned the ball over giving the Lions good field position for a field goal and against the Cowboys where a blocked field goal and an AP fumble were the difference in the game. He isn't a superstar yet, but he seems to be doing all the right things when he is healthy
It's not that I disagree with this statement, but Jackson did throw 4 interceptions in the Detroit game I think. So that seemed to be more a case of almost winning despite Jackson's play, even if he was arguably the better of the bad quarterbacks that day.
Jfk10intex Wrote - 12/06/2007 @ 07:31:05 AM
and btw..... MATT...... ur ignorance i find distrubing.... the raiders will get whooped... i mean lets get real here.... lets be honest with urself.... u know the packers are going to win but maybe matt just wanted a little extra attention cause mommy didnt give him enough attention when he was a little boy. am i right=]
Also, interesting note regarding the ludicrous nature of a pick for Oakland this week: The line is Oakland +10.5. The line in the Steelers game is Pittsburgh +10.5.
Point spreads don't mean everything, but it's fun to note that a few people picked Pittsburgh, including, ....wait for it, Jfk10intex. Anyway, whatever "ur ignorance" means, I think it was mostly a comment drenched in homerism and overzealous sports banter and not serious questioning of someone's intellect, so none of this is a big deal, but I watched the lines this morning and thought it was good food for thought.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Jon messed with this at 12/09/2007 9:00:03 am
Alex - You've got to trust your instinct, and let go of regret
12/09/2007 @ 10:11:09 AM
If we're going to make fun of anyone's picks I say we heckle those who picked the Dolphins. 0-16 is in reach, I think they're focused on their goal and will be able to pull it off. I mean, you'd have to be trying to be this bad, right?
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Sarah - So's your face
12/09/2007 @ 10:17:58 AM
When we were in Orlando we went to Disney's Boardwalk. They were holding the College Football Awards that night. We got there when all the players were leaving the awards. I was five feet away from Howie Long, who must've been a presenter. We also were by lots of players, but since I don't follow college football, I had no idea who they were. Still kind of cool though.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Alex - Who controls the past now controls the future
12/09/2007 @ 11:02:50 AM
Sarah Wrote - 12/09/2007 @ 10:17:58 AM
When we were in Orlando we went to Disney's Boardwalk. They were holding the College Football Awards that night. We got there when all the players were leaving the awards. I was five feet away from Howie Long, who must've been a presenter. We also were by lots of players, but since I don't follow college football, I had no idea who they were. Still kind of cool though.
I think he was there because his son won some awards. Just heard on pregame show.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Alex edited this at 12/09/2007 11:03:00 am
Jfk10intex - My computer is better than yours!!!!
12/09/2007 @ 11:17:34 AM
Jon Wrote - 12/09/2007 @ 08:57:27 AM
Also, interesting note regarding the ludicrous nature of a pick for Oakland this week: The line is Oakland +10.5. The line in the Steelers game is Pittsburgh +10.5.
Point spreads don't mean everything, but it's fun to note that a few people picked Pittsburgh, including, ....wait for it, Jfk10intex. Anyway, whatever "ur ignorance" means, I think it was mostly a comment drenched in homerism and overzealous sports banter and not serious questioning of someone's intellect, so none of this is a big deal, but I watched the lines this morning and thought it was good food for thought.
Also, interesting note regarding the ludicrous nature of a pick for Oakland this week: The line is Oakland +10.5. The line in the Steelers game is Pittsburgh +10.5.
Point spreads don't mean everything, but it's fun to note that a few people picked Pittsburgh, including, ....wait for it, Jfk10intex. Anyway, whatever "ur ignorance" means, I think it was mostly a comment drenched in homerism and overzealous sports banter and not serious questioning of someone's intellect, so none of this is a big deal, but I watched the lines this morning and thought it was good food for thought.
lol.... i have a good feeling the steelers will win... i have good reason to... have u seen them play? I have a feeling that i will lose less than 2 games this week.... i probabaly will beat.....wait for it....Jon so before you make some snide remarks look at some statistics and watch espn for a little while and then come talk to me.... you got that buddy? btw... when matt picked the raiders he had absolutley no reason to pick them the raiders are playing in Green Bay...lets get real here the steelers have like a way better shot at being the pats then the raiders do at beating the packers....
Yours:
Total:
Rated 2 times.
Total:
Rated 2 times.
Alex - I was too weak to give in Too strong to lose
12/09/2007 @ 11:21:01 AM
Ok, that one's too easy. I say we let it slide.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Matt - 3845 Posts
12/09/2007 @ 11:45:25 AM
You should talk Alex. You picked the Niners over the Vikings. Don't you know that the Vikings are unstoppable now????? Your ignorance of football disturbs me. 
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Alex - 3429 Posts
12/09/2007 @ 12:01:33 PM
When I made that pick I for some reason thought the 49ers defense was better than average, which I have since looked up and found out that's not really the case. But I'm not a flip-flopper so I'll stand by my pick.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Alex edited this at 12/09/2007 12:02:25 pm
Alex - But let history remember, that as free men, we chose to make it so!
12/09/2007 @ 12:10:17 PM
Alex Wrote - 12/09/2007 @ 10:11:09 AM
If we're going to make fun of anyone's picks I say we heckle those who picked the Dolphins. 0-16 is in reach, I think they're focused on their goal and will be able to pull it off. I mean, you'd have to be trying to be this bad, right?
First drive, Buffalo up 7.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Sarah - 4621 Posts
12/09/2007 @ 12:39:36 PM
Buffalo up 14.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Sarah - 4621 Posts
12/09/2007 @ 12:43:39 PM
21-0 Buffalo. 
This is fun.
This is fun.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Alex - 3429 Posts
12/09/2007 @ 12:43:55 PM
Now 21. [Too slow]
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Alex messed with this at 12/09/2007 12:44:24 pm
Sarah - How do you use these things?
12/09/2007 @ 12:48:19 PM
Little Samkon scored for Miami, I thought he was still with the Texans... Yay for Samkon!
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Alex - 3429 Posts
12/09/2007 @ 12:58:21 PM
That should help keep Woodson healthy.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Sarah - 4621 Posts
12/09/2007 @ 01:04:53 PM
Well, if Blackmon stays healthy himself. I think he's been with us a few years. Go Pack!
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Jfk10intex - 224 Posts
12/09/2007 @ 01:09:04 PM
lets make this 21-0 at the half .... GO PACK GO!
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Sarah - 4621 Posts
12/09/2007 @ 01:18:01 PM
The Lions are my friends right now.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Sarah - 4621 Posts
12/09/2007 @ 02:51:58 PM
Put'er in the ol' vise!
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Scott - Get Up! Get outta here! Gone!
12/09/2007 @ 04:49:47 PM
If the lions would just learn to jump on a fumble, the Packers would be tied with the Cowboys right now.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Musch - 20 Posts
12/09/2007 @ 06:17:06 PM
so upset, the lions had it :(
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Alex - 3429 Posts
12/09/2007 @ 07:14:03 PM
Scott Wrote - 12/09/2007 @ 04:49:47 PM
If the lions would just learn to jump on a fumble, the Packers would be tied with the Cowboys right now.
Except not really, since the Cowboys have the tiebreaker.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Sarah - 4621 Posts
12/09/2007 @ 08:42:27 PM
Alex Wrote - 12/09/2007 @ 07:14:03 PM
Except not really, since the Cowboys have the tiebreaker.
Scott Wrote - 12/09/2007 @ 04:49:47 PM
If the lions would just learn to jump on a fumble, the Packers would be tied with the Cowboys right now.
Except not really, since the Cowboys have the tiebreaker.
It certainly wouldn't hurt. Plus, then we'd only need them to lose 1 of their last 3 games.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Jeremy - 9183 Posts
12/09/2007 @ 09:50:58 PM
Sarah Wrote - 12/09/2007 @ 08:42:27 PM
It certainly wouldn't hurt. Plus, then we'd only need them to lose 1 of their last 3 games.
Alex Wrote - 12/09/2007 @ 07:14:03 PM
Except not really, since the Cowboys have the tiebreaker.
Scott Wrote - 12/09/2007 @ 04:49:47 PM
If the lions would just learn to jump on a fumble, the Packers would be tied with the Cowboys right now.
Except not really, since the Cowboys have the tiebreaker.
It certainly wouldn't hurt. Plus, then we'd only need them to lose 1 of their last 3 games.
And win out.
Some guy fell to his death at the Vikes-49ers game today.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Jfk10intex - My computer is better than yours!!!!
12/10/2007 @ 07:13:42 AM
now im praying the falcons can win against the saints... i know reggie bush isnt a major impact with the Saints.... but i mean he is out so the running game went out the window... the falcons have a good pass defense... so if they put the pressure on Brees make him make bad throws the falcons may just have a shot at this game.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Jfk10intex - My computer is better than yours!!!!
12/10/2007 @ 07:14:38 AM
hey RomOwens bring a football to school today i didnt bring mine...
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Carlos44ec - Tater Salad?
12/10/2007 @ 07:46:42 AM
Jfk10intex Wrote - 12/10/2007 @ 07:14:38 AM
hey RomOwens bring a football to school today i didnt bring mine...
...and don't forget to bring my homework to Study Hall.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
customshopkv1
12/10/2007 @ 09:04:55 AM
Jfk10intex Wrote - 12/10/2007 @ 07:13:42 AM
now im praying the falcons can win against the saints... i know reggie bush isnt a major impact with the Saints.... but i mean he is out so the running game went out the window... the falcons have a good pass defense... so if they put the pressure on Brees make him make bad throws the falcons may just have a shot at this game.
No Reggie Bush (PCL)
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Jeremy - Broadcast in stunning 1080i
12/10/2007 @ 09:13:05 AM
customshopkv1 Wrote - 12/10/2007 @ 09:04:55 AM
No Reggie Bush (PCL)
Jfk10intex Wrote - 12/10/2007 @ 07:13:42 AM
now im praying the falcons can win against the saints... i know reggie bush isnt a major impact with the Saints.... but i mean he is out so the running game went out the window... the falcons have a good pass defense... so if they put the pressure on Brees make him make bad throws the falcons may just have a shot at this game.
No Reggie Bush (PCL)
I think that was his point.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Jeremy - 9183 Posts
12/10/2007 @ 10:26:20 AM
Also I just wanted to point out that although the Vikings did beat up on an inferior team that this is exactly the kind of game they ALWAYS lost in years past. Everyone that needed to lose lost and they were playing a team they should have beat soundly, and did, that hasn't happened in a long long time.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
PackOne - 1429 Posts
12/10/2007 @ 11:57:19 AM
Can someone kill my fantasy team please. Ughhh.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Carlos44ec - "If at first you don't succeed, failure may be your style."
12/10/2007 @ 12:25:55 PM
ditto.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Alex - Ignorance is bliss to those uneducated
12/10/2007 @ 01:26:18 PM
Peterson's big fat 0 cost me doughnuts this week at work. Never again will a horny goldilocks man be on any of my fantasy teams.
Yours:
Total:
Rated 2 times.
Total:
Rated 2 times.
Jeremy - No one's gay for Moleman
12/10/2007 @ 01:30:48 PM
Alex Wrote - 12/10/2007 @ 01:26:18 PM
Never again will a horny goldilocks man be on any of my fantasy teams.
It took me a second to figure out what the hell you meant. I look forward to the eventual influx of people googling "horny goldilocks."
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Alex - 3429 Posts
12/10/2007 @ 01:32:21 PM
Jeremy Wrote - 12/10/2007 @ 01:30:48 PM
Alex Wrote - 12/10/2007 @ 01:26:18 PM
It took me a second to figure out what the hell you meant. I look forward to the eventual influx of people googling "horny goldilocks."Never again will a horny goldilocks man be on any of my fantasy teams.
I do what I can to generate traffic.
I had to drop Sidney Rice on 2 teams, but I'm clean now.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Carlos44ec - "Always remember that you are unique. Just like everybody else."
12/10/2007 @ 02:29:53 PM
because I am affraid of that google search, what is it? I don't want an HR reprimand...
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Jeremy - 9183 Posts
12/10/2007 @ 02:36:47 PM
Yours:
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Total:
Rated 1 times.
Carlos44ec - 2038 Posts
12/10/2007 @ 03:15:27 PM
oh god... I must be tired or half stupid.
thanks, now I feel like a knob.
thanks, now I feel like a knob.
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
jthompto
12/10/2007 @ 07:04:21 PM
Jeremy Wrote - 12/10/2007 @ 10:26:20 AM
Also I just wanted to point out that although the Vikings did beat up on an inferior team that this is exactly the kind of game they ALWAYS lost in years past. Everyone that needed to lose lost and they were playing a team they should have beat soundly, and did, that hasn't happened in a long long time.
A great example of this is the 2003 season, in which the Vikings finished 9-7, missing the playoffs and division title by one game. In that season they lost to the chargers, raiders, cardinals and giants. Those teams ending up having the fist 4 picks in the next years draft and all finished worse than 4-12.
And we all remember the 4 year stretch or so, when the Vikings failed to win a game outdoors!
Yours:
Rated 0 times.
Rated 0 times.
Leave a Comment of your very own
| Name: | |||
| Comment: | |||
| |||
Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.
Bears 16 @ Commanders 24
Jeremy
This one is a tough call. On one hand the Redskins have just had too much going on this week. On the other hand the funeral could "galvanize" the team.Sarah
Insert semi-witty comment later - I'm headed to Florida!Matt
I'm not quite sure what to make of the Bears.Jon
Chicago is all over the place.