Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
These are not our most current picks! Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2025 Season Week 1 Picks.
NFL 2009 Season Week 12 Picks
Packers 34 @ Lions 12
Final
Thu, 11/26/09 11:30am
15 Picks - 94%
1 Pick - 6%
Packers

Lions

Packers

Packers

Raiders 7 @ Cowboys 24
Final
Thu, 11/26/09 3:15pm
1 Pick - 6%
17 Picks - 94%
Cowboys

Cowboys

Cowboys

Cowboys

Giants 6 @ Broncos 26
Final
Thu, 11/26/09 7:20pm
14 Picks - 78%
4 Picks - 22%
Giants

Giants

Broncos

Broncos

Buccaneers 17 @ Falcons 20
Final
Sun, 11/29/09 12:00pm
1 Pick - 5%
20 Picks - 95%
Falcons

Falcons

Falcons

Falcons

Dolphins 14 @ Bills 31
Final
Sun, 11/29/09 12:00pm
19 Picks - 95%
1 Pick - 5%
Dolphins

Dolphins

Dolphins

Dolphins

Browns 7 @ Bengals 16
Final
Sun, 11/29/09 12:00pm
0 Picks - 0%
21 Picks - 100%
Bengals

Bengals

Bengals

Bengals

Cardinals 17 @ Titans 20
Final
Sun, 11/29/09 12:00pm
9 Picks - 43%
12 Picks - 57%
Cardinals

Cardinals

Titans

Titans

Seahawks 27 @ Rams 17
Final
Sun, 11/29/09 12:00pm
17 Picks - 81%
4 Picks - 19%
Seahawks

Seahawks

Seahawks

Rams

Bears 10 @ Vikings 36
Final
Sun, 11/29/09 12:00pm
0 Picks - 0%
21 Picks - 100%
Vikings

Vikings

Vikings

Vikings

Panthers 6 @ Jets 17
Final
Sun, 11/29/09 12:00pm
7 Picks - 35%
13 Picks - 65%
Panthers

Jets

Jets

Panthers

Commanders 24 @ Eagles 27
Final
Sun, 11/29/09 12:00pm
0 Picks - 0%
21 Picks - 100%
Eagles

Eagles

Eagles

Eagles

Colts 35 @ Texans 27
Final
Sun, 11/29/09 12:00pm
19 Picks - 90%
2 Picks - 10%
Colts

Colts

Colts

Colts

Chiefs 14 @ Chargers 43
Final
Sun, 11/29/09 3:05pm
1 Pick - 5%
20 Picks - 95%
Chargers

Chargers

Chargers

Chargers

Jaguars 3 @ 49ers 20
Final
Sun, 11/29/09 3:05pm
13 Picks - 62%
8 Picks - 38%
Jaguars

49ers

Jaguars

Jaguars

Steelers 17 @ Ravens 20
final overtime
Sun, 11/29/09 7:20pm
6 Picks - 27%
16 Picks - 73%
Ravens

Ravens

Ravens

Ravens

Patriots 17 @ Saints 38
Final
Mon, 11/30/09 7:30pm
7 Picks - 32%
15 Picks - 68%
Patriots

Saints

Saints

Saints

Week Record:
10 - 60.625

Season Record:
115 - 610.653
No-Pack-Vike Record:
1158 - 6470.642
Lifetime Record:
1294 - 7490.633
Week Record:
12 - 40.750

Season Record:
117 - 590.665
No-Pack-Vike Record:
1095 - 7100.607
Lifetime Record:
1210 - 8330.592
Week Record:
14 - 20.875

Season Record:
116 - 600.659
No-Pack-Vike Record:
1156 - 6490.640
Lifetime Record:
1281 - 7620.627
Week Record:
12 - 40.750

Season Record:
123 - 530.699
No-Pack-Vike Record:
1148 - 6570.636
Lifetime Record:
1279 - 7640.626



Packers
Cowboys
Broncos
Falcons
Dolphins
Bengals
Titans
Seahawks
Vikings
Jets
Eagles
Colts
Chargers
49ers
Ravens
Saints
Week: | 15 - 1 0.938 |
Season: | 123 - 53 0.699 |
Lifetime: | 628 - 348 0.643 |


Packers
Raiders
Giants
Falcons
Dolphins
Bengals
Titans
Seahawks
Vikings
Jets
Eagles
Colts
Chargers
Jaguars
Ravens
Saints
Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
Season: | 118 - 58 0.670 |
Lifetime: | 605 - 370 0.621 |


Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Falcons
Dolphins
Bengals
Cardinals
Seahawks
Vikings
Jets
Eagles
Texans
Chargers
49ers
Steelers
Patriots
Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
Season: | 100 - 61 0.621 |
Lifetime: | 583 - 373 0.610 |


LV @ DAL - No Pick
NYG @ DEN - No Pick
Falcons
Dolphins
Bengals
Cardinals
Seahawks
Vikings
Jets
Eagles
Colts
Chargers
Jaguars
Ravens
Saints
Week: | 10 - 3 0.769 |
Season: | 91 - 50 0.645 |
Lifetime: | 210 - 150 0.583 |


LV @ DAL - No Pick
NYG @ DEN - No Pick
Falcons
Bills
Bengals
Cardinals
Rams
Vikings
Panthers
Eagles
Colts
Chargers
49ers
Ravens
Saints
Week: | 10 - 3 0.769 |
Season: | 103 - 55 0.652 |
Lifetime: | 414 - 275 0.601 |


Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Falcons
Dolphins
Bengals
Titans
Seahawks
Vikings
Jets
Eagles
Colts
Chargers
Jaguars
Ravens
Patriots
Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
Season: | 114 - 62 0.648 |
Lifetime: | 400 - 245 0.620 |


Cowboys
Giants
Falcons
MIA @ BUF - No PickBengals
Titans
Rams
Vikings
Jets
Eagles
Colts
Chargers
49ers
Ravens
Saints
Week: | 12 - 2 0.857 |
Season: | 104 - 44 0.703 |
Lifetime: | 322 - 178 0.644 |


LV @ DAL - No Pick
NYG @ DEN - No Pick
Falcons
Dolphins
Bengals
Titans
Seahawks
Vikings
Jets
Eagles
Colts
Chargers
Jaguars
Steelers
Saints
Week: | 10 - 3 0.769 |
Season: | 97 - 48 0.669 |
Lifetime: | 358 - 196 0.646 |


Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Falcons
Dolphins
Bengals
Titans
Seahawks
Vikings
Jets
Eagles
Colts
Chargers
49ers
Ravens
Saints
Week: | 14 - 2 0.875 |
Season: | 112 - 64 0.636 |
Lifetime: | 199 - 135 0.596 |


Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Falcons
Dolphins
Bengals
Titans
Seahawks
Vikings
Panthers
Eagles
Texans
Chargers
49ers
Steelers
Patriots
Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
Season: | 111 - 63 0.638 |
Lifetime: | 273 - 143 0.656 |


Cowboys
Broncos
Falcons
Dolphins
Bengals
Titans
Seahawks
Vikings
Jets
Eagles
Colts
Chargers
Jaguars
Ravens
Saints
Week: | 13 - 2 0.867 |
Season: | 120 - 54 0.690 |
Lifetime: | 251 - 125 0.668 |


Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Falcons
Dolphins
Bengals
Titans
Seahawks
Vikings
Panthers
Eagles
Colts
Chargers
Jaguars
Steelers
Patriots
Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
Season: | 116 - 59 0.663 |
Lifetime: | 116 - 59 0.663 |


Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Falcons
Dolphins
Bengals
Cardinals
Seahawks
Vikings
Panthers
Eagles
Colts
Chargers
49ers
Ravens
Saints
Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
Season: | 110 - 57 0.659 |
Lifetime: | 110 - 57 0.659 |

Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Falcons
Dolphins
Bengals
Cardinals
Seahawks
Vikings
CAR @ NYJ - No PickEagles
Colts
Chiefs
Jaguars
Ravens
Saints
Week: | 10 - 5 0.667 |
Season: | 82 - 52 0.612 |
Lifetime: | 82 - 52 0.612 |


Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Falcons
Dolphins
Bengals
Cardinals
Seahawks
Vikings
Jets
Eagles
Colts
Chargers
Jaguars
Ravens
Saints
Week: | 12 - 4 0.750 |
Season: | 101 - 42 0.706 |
Lifetime: | 101 - 42 0.706 |


Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Buccaneers
Dolphins
Bengals
Titans
Rams
Vikings
Jets
Eagles
Colts
Chargers
Jaguars
Ravens
Patriots
Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
Season: | 73 - 42 0.635 |
Lifetime: | 73 - 42 0.635 |


Packers
Cowboys
Giants
Falcons
Dolphins
Bengals
Cardinals
Seahawks
Vikings
Panthers
Eagles
Colts
Chargers
Jaguars
Steelers
Saints
Week: | 10 - 6 0.625 |
Season: | 57 - 34 0.626 |
Lifetime: | 57 - 34 0.626 |

LV @ DAL - No Pick
NYG @ DEN - No Pick
TB @ ATL - No Pick
MIA @ BUF - No Pick
CLE @ CIN - No Pick
ARI @ TEN - No Pick
SEA @ LA - No Pick
CHI @ MIN - No Pick
CAR @ NYJ - No Pick
WAS @ PHI - No Pick
IND @ HOU - No Pick
KC @ LAC - No Pick
JAC @ SF - No Pick
Steelers
Patriots
Week: | 0 - 2 0.000 |
Season: | 0 - 2 0.000 |
Lifetime: | 0 - 2 0.000 |
![]() | Raiders 7 @ Cowboys 24 | ![]() |
![]() | JeremyThe Cowboys trail 3-0 with 24 yards of offense before scoring a TD with 12 seconds left to win. |
![]() | MattGradkowski... Romo... The NFL on CBS! |
![]() | JonThis could be a good game. |
![]() | SarahThere are a lot of interesting match ups this week. This is one I don't care about, hurray for travel time! |
![]() | Giants 6 @ Broncos 26 | ![]() |
![]() | JeremyThese teams square off to decide, once and for all, who will be the team you can least predict anything about. |
![]() | MattI choose not to comment. |
![]() | JonInstead of complaining that I can't watch this game, I'm going to be thankful that I can watch the other two and be happy that I can spend some time doing other stuff instead of watching this. |
![]() | SarahFor a lot of the games, I think it's just going to come down to who can suck less. These two teams are on some of the worst slides I've seen in awhile. |
![]() | Bears 10 @ Vikings 36 | ![]() |
![]() | JeremyIf my calculations are correct, the Bears would be eliminated this week. Hopefully Cutler gives the Vikings 19 opportunities for easy interceptions. |
![]() | MattThe Bears haven't shown any signs of being good lately, but you never know, especially with division matchups. That said... Minnesota 37 - Chicago 10. |
![]() | JonThe ol' second half of the season meeting for the first time trick. Here's the thing, this game got moved to a later time, so now I'm going to have to miss it. I will be attempting a blackout. No football info until I can watch the recording of this game, which won't be until very late at night. So no calls or texts or anything about the game until I give the go-ahead. |
![]() | SarahRemember when everyone was excited that we were going to have Rodgers, Favre, and Cutler in our division lighting it up? Cutler has been a major disappointment, and the Bears luck with QBs continues. |
![]() | Steelers 17 @ Ravens 20 | ![]() |
![]() | JeremyIt's tough to win with your 3rd string Qb, but on the other hand, does anyone feel like the Ravens are one of those teams, of which there's one every year, that everyone insists on insisting are a great team, no matter how many games they lose? |
![]() | MattDixon... Flacco... The NFL on NBC!!! |
![]() | JonApparently the Dennis Dixon era has begun. I watched him a little in college I think. Impressive, but that was years ago and college, so I won't expect an outstanding performance. |
![]() | SarahShould be a good game. What's the status on Big Ben? Might have to change my pick closer to game time. |
![]() | Patriots 17 @ Saints 38 | ![]() |
![]() | JeremyLet's go Pats! The Saints have played some ugly football lately, so maybe it's premature to say that this game will decide 15-1 or 16-0, but let's just get one in the loss column and see what happens from there. |
![]() | MattI don't like the Patriots, and I'm kind of indifferent on the Saints these days, so even though it's a big matchup, I'm not really that interested. |
![]() | JonAnyone outside of New England cheering for the Patriots in this one? Of course, don't be silly. But I want New Orleans and I think a lot of other people do too. Then again, I shouldn't want the Saints to win. It would help Minnesota if they lost. And I don't really hate New England, they're just annoying a bit. But I like Drew Brees. Now I don't know what to do. Hey two Big Ten quarterbacks. |
![]() | SarahThe Patriots can suck it. I'm so sick of them and every time they lose, it just makes me so happy! I am not sure if I've gotten to watch more than 5 minutes of a Saints game this year, so it'll be interesting to see if they are the team of the NFC this year up close and personal. |


Sarah - So's your face
11/26/2009 @ 08:16:28 AM
Happy Thankgiving everyone! (doesn't look like a lot of people are going to make their Thursday picks!)


Scott - Resident Tech Support
11/26/2009 @ 01:53:53 PM
I love how Jeremy always points out that the Packers play teams that have hurt players just one week after the Packers lost 2 of their best defensive players for the season in 1 qtr. In fact, one of the Packer writers for JSOnline.com wrote that you have to go back to the 60s the last time the Packers had two more devastating injuries in one game. It would just be nice to hear a more creative critique at some point.
And furthermore, Stafford did play, his shoulder didn't seem to affect him that much, but the Packers defense is just that good.
And furthermore, Stafford did play, his shoulder didn't seem to affect him that much, but the Packers defense is just that good.
Scott edited this at 11/26/2009 1:58:20 pm


Jeremy - Robots don't say 'ye'
11/26/2009 @ 02:06:32 PM
First of all those are always tounge in cheeck. Secondly, I'm not sure pointing out that you have to reach back half a century for when the Packers lost two of their better players at once is the best way to make your point that I'm being uneven.
Jeremy screwed with this at 11/26/2009 2:07:04 pm


Scott - Resident Tech Support
11/26/2009 @ 02:19:32 PM
Jeremy Wrote - Today @ 03:06:32 PM
First of all those are always tounge in cheeck. Secondly, I'm not sure pointing out that you have to reach back half a century for when the Packers lost two of their better players at once is the best way to make your point that I'm being uneven.
Except that everytime the Packers play anyone where anyone on that team is injured (with no consideration for the injury situation for the Packers at the time), that's what come out. Also, Stafford actually played! So did Johnson! They weren't out for any time at all, not even 1 week. Sure, they weren't 100%, but the Packers lost 2 of their best players for 10+months (they may not be ready for next year even!).


Jeremy - Broadcast in stunning 1080i
11/26/2009 @ 02:23:31 PM
That's second time this year that the Packers have used a challenge where the "good" outcome is giving up a safety.


Jeremy - 9183 Posts
11/26/2009 @ 02:25:56 PM
Well obviously we know now they played. I'm not a soothsayer.


Jeremy - Pie Racist
11/26/2009 @ 02:32:01 PM
Remember when there was a penalty called "pass interference?" That would have gotten the lions a first down on the 1 yard line on their last 2 drives. Too bad they got rid of that.


Scott - No, I did not change your screen saver settings
11/27/2009 @ 07:47:23 AM
Jeremy Wrote - Yesterday @ 03:23:31 PM
That's second time this year that the Packers have used a challenge where the "good" outcome is giving up a safety.
This may be the most unbreakable record in NFL history.


Scott - Resident Tech Support
11/27/2009 @ 07:48:41 AM
This is the first time this season I made correct picks on the Thursday game, and I hit the jackpot getting all 3 games correct on thursday! But then again, so did the one person I'm chasing.


Scott - Ma'am, can you make sure your computer is turned on?
11/27/2009 @ 04:19:38 PM
I'm looking at some stats from NFL.com and I think Aaron Rodgers is really coming into his own. He seems to be figuring some things out where he struggled even as recent as three weeks ago. For one thing, he hasn't gotten sacked much in the last three games, I think like 4 total in the last 3 games. Considering he was averaging about 5 per game, that's a pretty big improvement. But aside from that, because we all knew that he needed to improve that area there's this: he is becoming a big play QB who still has a high completion percentage. Rodgers is second in the NFL in number of completions over 40 yards, and 4th in completions of 20 or more. And he's still in the top 3rd of completion percentage, and he's 2nd in yards per attempt.
Now I'm not saying that he is the next re-incarnation of Favre, but in the 2nd half of his 2nd year as a starter, he is playing very well, and I think a big part of the Packers' success must be attributed to him. Some of their failures should be attributed to him, but I guess that's how the QB position goes. All-in-all, I am very excited about the current and future of the Packers QB position where I once was a bit skeptical.
And by the way, for anyone who didn't realize (me being one of those) Aaron Rodgers has a fricken cannon of an arm. He threw a pass against Detroit that traveled 70 yards in the air. I watched the replay over and over again, and it didn't even look like he put everything into it. Maybe that's sort of like a baseball player overswinging doesn't mean he's going to hit it farther, but still, he seemed to plant and throw, and the ball just took off. The announcers even mentioned that it would have been a touchdown but that it was "underthrown" a bit so Driver had to come back to it. Ok, 70 yards in the air, does it qualify as "underthrown" at that distance?
Now I'm not saying that he is the next re-incarnation of Favre, but in the 2nd half of his 2nd year as a starter, he is playing very well, and I think a big part of the Packers' success must be attributed to him. Some of their failures should be attributed to him, but I guess that's how the QB position goes. All-in-all, I am very excited about the current and future of the Packers QB position where I once was a bit skeptical.
And by the way, for anyone who didn't realize (me being one of those) Aaron Rodgers has a fricken cannon of an arm. He threw a pass against Detroit that traveled 70 yards in the air. I watched the replay over and over again, and it didn't even look like he put everything into it. Maybe that's sort of like a baseball player overswinging doesn't mean he's going to hit it farther, but still, he seemed to plant and throw, and the ball just took off. The announcers even mentioned that it would have been a touchdown but that it was "underthrown" a bit so Driver had to come back to it. Ok, 70 yards in the air, does it qualify as "underthrown" at that distance?


PackOne - There's music to play. Places to go. People to see.
11/28/2009 @ 10:27:18 AM
I should boycott this week because picks weren't up Wednesday morning.

Sarah - So's your face
11/28/2009 @ 10:35:50 AM
They're always up, they maybe just weren't "live" because someone hadn't posted any comments yet. But if you don't want to make picks, all the better for me!


Matt - 3845 Posts
11/29/2009 @ 06:29:16 PM
Damn you Chris Kluwe!!!
Leave a Comment of your very own
Name: | |||
Comment: | |||
| |||


Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.
Packers 34 @ Lions 12
Jeremy
Stafford has the game of a lifetime, then remembers he has the Packers up next and gets hurt on the last play of the game. Sure, the Packers would probably win these games anyway, but it would be nice if they had to play them with any of their best players once in a while.Matt
Since I assume that Jeremy will cover the whole "Stafford and Johnson get injured just in time for the Packers" angle [checking..... yup it's covered], I'll just say Detroit 27 - Green Bay 21.Jon
Happy Thanksgiving! Have a blessed day.Sarah
The annual national Lions game. When was the last time they were on a Sunday night or Monday night game? Someone else can look that up for me. The Lions usually turn it up a notch on T-Day, so it should be interesting game. Our defensive stars are out, but their only offensive weapons may be out, so that'd kind of a wash. I guess it's up to A-Rod to win this game.Happy Thanksgiving everyone!