Create an Account or Login to make your own picks!
These are not our most current picks! Our freshest batch of picks are the NFL 2025 Season Week 1 Picks.
NFL 2009 Season Week 9 Picks
Commanders 17 @ Falcons 31
Final
Sun, 11/8/09 12:00pm
0 Picks - 0%
23 Picks - 100%
Falcons

Falcons

Falcons

Falcons

Cardinals 41 @ Bears 21
Final
Sun, 11/8/09 12:00pm
13 Picks - 57%
10 Picks - 43%
Bears

Cardinals

Cardinals

Cardinals

Ravens 7 @ Bengals 17
Final
Sun, 11/8/09 12:00pm
8 Picks - 35%
15 Picks - 65%
Ravens

Bengals

Ravens

Bengals

Texans 17 @ Colts 20
Final
Sun, 11/8/09 12:00pm
1 Pick - 4%
22 Picks - 96%
Colts

Colts

Colts

Colts

Dolphins 17 @ Patriots 27
Final
Sun, 11/8/09 12:00pm
0 Picks - 0%
23 Picks - 100%
Patriots

Patriots

Patriots

Patriots

Packers 28 @ Buccaneers 38
Final
Sun, 11/8/09 12:00pm
22 Picks - 96%
1 Pick - 4%
Packers

Buccaneers

Packers

Packers

Chiefs 21 @ Jaguars 24
Final
Sun, 11/8/09 12:00pm
1 Pick - 4%
22 Picks - 96%
Jaguars

Jaguars

Jaguars

Jaguars

Lions 20 @ Seahawks 32
Final
Sun, 11/8/09 3:05pm
2 Picks - 9%
21 Picks - 91%
Seahawks

Seahawks

Seahawks

Seahawks

Panthers 20 @ Saints 30
Final
Sun, 11/8/09 3:05pm
0 Picks - 0%
23 Picks - 100%
Saints

Saints

Saints

Saints

Chargers 21 @ Giants 20
Final
Sun, 11/8/09 3:15pm
7 Picks - 30%
16 Picks - 70%
Giants

Giants

Giants

Chargers

Titans 34 @ 49ers 27
Final
Sun, 11/8/09 3:15pm
5 Picks - 22%
18 Picks - 78%
49ers

49ers

49ers

49ers

Cowboys 20 @ Eagles 16
Final
Sun, 11/8/09 7:20pm
4 Picks - 17%
19 Picks - 83%
Eagles

Cowboys

Eagles

Eagles

Steelers 28 @ Broncos 10
Final
Mon, 11/9/09 7:30pm
12 Picks - 52%
11 Picks - 48%
Steelers

Broncos

Broncos

Broncos

Week Record:
7 - 60.538

Season Record:
86 - 430.667
No-Pack-Vike Record:
1134 - 6300.643
Lifetime Record:
1265 - 7310.634
Week Record:
10 - 30.769

Season Record:
84 - 450.651
No-Pack-Vike Record:
1065 - 6990.604
Lifetime Record:
1177 - 8190.590
Week Record:
7 - 60.538

Season Record:
83 - 460.643
No-Pack-Vike Record:
1128 - 6360.639
Lifetime Record:
1248 - 7480.625
Week Record:
9 - 40.692

Season Record:
90 - 390.698
No-Pack-Vike Record:
1120 - 6440.635
Lifetime Record:
1246 - 7500.624



Falcons
Bears
Bengals
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Chargers
49ers
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
Season: | 90 - 39 0.698 |
Lifetime: | 595 - 334 0.640 |


Falcons
Cardinals
Ravens
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Giants
49ers
Eagles
Broncos
Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
Season: | 84 - 45 0.651 |
Lifetime: | 571 - 357 0.615 |


Falcons
Bears
Bengals
Texans
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Giants
49ers
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
Season: | 71 - 44 0.617 |
Lifetime: | 554 - 356 0.609 |


Falcons
Bears
Bengals
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Giants
49ers
Eagles
Broncos
Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
Season: | 59 - 39 0.602 |
Lifetime: | 178 - 139 0.561 |


Falcons
Bears
Bengals
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Chargers
Titans
Eagles
Broncos
Week: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
Season: | 74 - 41 0.643 |
Lifetime: | 385 - 261 0.596 |


Falcons
Cardinals
Bengals
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Giants
49ers
Eagles
Broncos
Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
Season: | 67 - 45 0.598 |
Lifetime: | 357 - 236 0.602 |


Falcons
Bears
Ravens
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Lions
Saints
Chargers
Titans
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
Season: | 79 - 50 0.612 |
Lifetime: | 365 - 233 0.610 |


Falcons
Cardinals
Bengals
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Giants
49ers
Cowboys
Steelers
Week: | 10 - 3 0.769 |
Season: | 68 - 34 0.667 |
Lifetime: | 329 - 182 0.644 |


Falcons
Bears
Ravens
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Giants
Titans
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
Season: | 77 - 52 0.597 |
Lifetime: | 164 - 123 0.571 |


Falcons
Bears
Ravens
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Giants
Titans
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
Season: | 82 - 46 0.641 |
Lifetime: | 244 - 126 0.659 |


Falcons
Bears
Bengals
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Giants
49ers
Eagles
Broncos
Week: | 7 - 6 0.538 |
Season: | 86 - 42 0.672 |
Lifetime: | 217 - 113 0.658 |


Falcons
Cardinals
Bengals
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Giants
Titans
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 10 - 3 0.769 |
Season: | 86 - 43 0.667 |
Lifetime: | 86 - 43 0.667 |


Falcons
Cardinals
Bengals
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Chargers
49ers
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 10 - 3 0.769 |
Season: | 84 - 45 0.651 |
Lifetime: | 84 - 45 0.651 |

Falcons
Cardinals
Ravens
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Giants
49ers
Cowboys
Broncos
Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
Season: | 52 - 36 0.591 |
Lifetime: | 52 - 36 0.591 |


Falcons
Cardinals
Bengals
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Chargers
49ers
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 10 - 3 0.769 |
Season: | 66 - 30 0.688 |
Lifetime: | 66 - 30 0.688 |


Falcons
Cardinals
Bengals
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Giants
49ers
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
Season: | 43 - 26 0.623 |
Lifetime: | 43 - 26 0.623 |


Falcons
Cardinals
Bengals
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Chiefs
Lions
Saints
Giants
49ers
Eagles
Broncos
Week: | 6 - 7 0.462 |
Season: | 25 - 20 0.556 |
Lifetime: | 25 - 20 0.556 |


Falcons
Bears
Bengals
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Chargers
49ers
Eagles
Steelers
Week: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
Season: | 9 - 4 0.692 |
Lifetime: | 9 - 4 0.692 |

Falcons
Cardinals
Ravens
Colts
Patriots
Packers
Jaguars
Seahawks
Saints
Giants
49ers
Cowboys
Broncos
Week: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
Season: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
Lifetime: | 8 - 5 0.615 |
![]() | Cowboys 20 @ Eagles 16 | ![]() |
![]() | Sarahnfc east... Still a powerhouse? Nah they seem to be fading. |
![]() | JeremyOne nice thing about all the Favre hoopla; it has severely cut down on the amount of time the media can dedicate to talking about the NFC East. |
![]() | MattI don't like the Eagles, so I'll take the Cowboys. |
![]() | JonAndy Reid and Donovan McNabb actually might be underrated if you think about it. |
![]() | Steelers 28 @ Broncos 10 | ![]() |
![]() | SarahWhatevs |
![]() | JeremyI've switched this back and forth a few times. By all accounts the Broncos should be a good team....but I just don't see how, so I can't trust them. |
![]() | MattI think the Broncos rebound from last week. Denver 24 - Steelers 19. |
![]() | JonDenver. I suppose. |


Scott - 6053 Posts
11/04/2009 @ 08:42:26 PM
I'm going to the Packers-Buccaneers game!

Sarah - 4621 Posts
11/04/2009 @ 09:11:23 PM
I imagine it will be about 90% Packer fans?


Jeremy - 9183 Posts
11/05/2009 @ 04:27:58 PM


Alex - You've got to trust your instinct, and let go of regret
11/05/2009 @ 05:41:43 PM
I think he's over doing the Favre for MVP campaign, but clearly Thompson's draft only team building method is looking questionable at best. It's been a sore point with callers all year on the radio stations down here. At the start of the season the Packers had a pretty decent top 22, but there was and is a serious lack of depth at multiple positions (although WR hasn't been an issue for years if you ask me). And being so much under the salary cap for the last couple years doesn't make any sense. But in his defense, Favre was already talking retirement before Thompson showed up and Rodgers was a potential top 2 pick that fell to 25th or whatever it was, and they got great value from that pick. If you want to make the argument that the Packers should have kept Favre over Rodgers, then the proposal should be that they should have traded Rodgers instead, not that they shouldn't have drafted him in the first place.

Sarah - 4621 Posts
11/08/2009 @ 08:44:19 AM
So Scott, when did you start tailgating??? :)


Sarah - 4621 Posts
11/08/2009 @ 02:08:38 PM
A streaker at the Packer game? Wouldn't be anyone we know I hope...


Sarah - 4621 Posts
11/08/2009 @ 03:21:28 PM
Well, that sucked, but was not unexpected. When do the Twins start up again?


Matt - 3845 Posts
11/08/2009 @ 03:23:10 PM
Suck it everybody.

Sarah - 4621 Posts
11/08/2009 @ 03:25:34 PM
You never pick the Packers so it's not like you're a genius on this pick.


Alex - Refactor Mercilessly
11/08/2009 @ 07:26:57 PM
Was anyone else surprised that before that game Rodgers had the best QB rating? The Packers have a ton of drops and no offensive line. Unfortunately that last issue doesn't seem likely to get fixed this season. Bye-bye Thompson.

Sarah - How do you use these things?
11/08/2009 @ 08:03:34 PM
Just because he has a high rating, doesn't mean he's doing a good job. I think qb rating is misleading. TT and MM will be gone after the season. TT was too obsessed with his draft picks and MM has lost the team's respect somehow. There's no other explanation for the penalties.


Jeremy - 9183 Posts
11/08/2009 @ 09:02:00 PM
Actually that seems like one of the least likely explanations.


Jeremy - 9183 Posts
11/09/2009 @ 01:01:49 AM
Aaron Rodgers gets sacked 4.6 times a game. Peyton Manning has been sacked 7 times, all year. Those are some pretty crazy extremes.
The state of the NFC North (as pertaining to the Vikings):
If the Packers were to go undefeated over the last 8 games they would need the Vikings to go 4-4. As today proved, there aren't really "gimmies" in the NFL,
* but today was more of a fluke than anything. Still, even by NFL standards, there are only a few "easy" games left. @Det on thanksgiving, at home against a feisty, yet record-wise inferior, 49ers, and the Seahawks. Otherwise they'd need to win vs Dallas, Baltimore, @Pittsburgh, and @ Arizona. You could make a case either way for @Chicago. So, assuming there are at least 2 losses in there, they would need the Vikes to go 2-6. In any case, though the Vikings have probably choked away bigger leads, it would seem the Packers are left looking at the wildcard spot if they want to make the playoffs. Elimination number: 5
If the Bears went undefeated they would hand the Vikings 2 losses, and would then hold the tie breaker, so they could get away with the Vikings going 5-1 in the other games. Of course, there's a catch 22 there, because while they have a better shot than the Packers, they're 4-4 without playing the Vikings at all yet. If they lose week 12 @Min, pretending we can skip there, they're 4-5 and the Vikings are 8-1. If the Bears then finished 11-5 they would need the Vikings to win only 3 more games, and hope the tie breakers work out. The Vikings have had their trouble against the Bears lately, though Favre traditionally has been their daddy, but still, the odds seem to be stacked against them. Elimination number: 6
If the Lions were to go undefeated they would be 9-7, would split with the Vikings, and need them to only win 2 more games, hope that the Bears/Packers don't do better than 9-7, and that the tie breakers worked out. Of course the tie breakers working out would be the least of their concerns because clearly we would need to deal with the epidemic of planes being knocked out of the sky by all the pigs that took flight. Elimination number: 3
*I shouldn't tease, since the Vikings are a lock to lose against Detroit, or at least would be in years past.
The state of the NFC North (as pertaining to the Vikings):
If the Packers were to go undefeated over the last 8 games they would need the Vikings to go 4-4. As today proved, there aren't really "gimmies" in the NFL,

If the Bears went undefeated they would hand the Vikings 2 losses, and would then hold the tie breaker, so they could get away with the Vikings going 5-1 in the other games. Of course, there's a catch 22 there, because while they have a better shot than the Packers, they're 4-4 without playing the Vikings at all yet. If they lose week 12 @Min, pretending we can skip there, they're 4-5 and the Vikings are 8-1. If the Bears then finished 11-5 they would need the Vikings to win only 3 more games, and hope the tie breakers work out. The Vikings have had their trouble against the Bears lately, though Favre traditionally has been their daddy, but still, the odds seem to be stacked against them. Elimination number: 6
If the Lions were to go undefeated they would be 9-7, would split with the Vikings, and need them to only win 2 more games, hope that the Bears/Packers don't do better than 9-7, and that the tie breakers worked out. Of course the tie breakers working out would be the least of their concerns because clearly we would need to deal with the epidemic of planes being knocked out of the sky by all the pigs that took flight. Elimination number: 3
*I shouldn't tease, since the Vikings are a lock to lose against Detroit, or at least would be in years past.
Jeremy messed with this 4 times, last at 11/09/2009 1:18:58 am


Scott - On your mark...get set...Terrible!
11/09/2009 @ 08:46:21 AM


Alex - 3429 Posts
11/09/2009 @ 10:54:40 AM
I pretty much considered the Vikings the division winners after week 8 already. It's all but official now.
Leave a Comment of your very own
Name: | |||
Comment: | |||
| |||


Sign up, or login, to be able to upload files for Nutcan.com users to see.
Packers 28 @ Buccaneers 38
Sarah
if the packers don't win this one...Jeremy
Packerland is starting to unravel. Luckily for them they have a bye this week.Matt
I think the Buccaneers are due.Jon
The orange color is fine. It's really the picture on the helmet that could be better.